Literature DB >> 18849478

Factors influencing the use of outcome measures for patients with low back pain: a survey of New Zealand physical therapists.

Janet M Copeland1, William J Taylor, Sarah G Dean.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation of patients with low back pain forms an important component of musculoskeletal physical therapist practice, yet treatment outcomes often are poorly measured.
OBJECTIVE: The study examined the methods used to evaluate treatment outcomes and factors influencing the use of outcome measures by New Zealand physical therapists.
DESIGN: This cross-sectional study used qualitative and quantitative methods for data collection.
METHODS: Two focus groups were conducted: one in a private practice (n=6) and one in a public hospital (n=6). A survey questionnaire was mailed to all private practices listed in a telecommunication database and to outpatient physical therapy departments at public hospitals (n=579).
RESULTS: The mail survey achieved a 65% response rate and showed that physical therapists use improvements in person-specific functional activities as their main outcome measure. Only 40% of the respondents reported using back-related outcome measures. The statistically significant factors determining their use were having a master's degree and an increased level of knowledge of outcome measurement, but these factors explained only 22% of the variance in the logistic regression model. Lack of time, frequently mentioned as a reason for not using standardized outcome measures, did not reach statistical significance. LIMITATIONS: The data collected relate to the physical therapists' reported or perceived behavior, which may be different from reality.
CONCLUSION: Physical therapists do not routinely use outcome measures in their clinical practice. A master's degree and increased knowledge were statistically significant factors supporting increased use of outcome measures. Further research is needed on how to convey to practitioners that the information they provide can be useful and can improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18849478     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20080083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  15 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  V K Noonan; D L Wolfe; N P Thorogood; S E Park; J T Hsieh; J J Eng
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Factors Influencing Physical Therapists' Use of Standardized Measures of Walking Capacity Poststroke Across the Care Continuum.

Authors:  Kira M Pattison; Dina Brooks; Jill I Cameron; Nancy M Salbach
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Assessing the Use of Standardized Outcome Measures for Stroke Rehabilitation among Physiotherapists in Ghana.

Authors:  Seth Kwame Agyenkwa; Cosmos Yarfi; Adjoa Nkrumah Banson; Woyram Abla Kofi-Bediako; Ulric Sena Abonie; Seth Kwadjo Angmorterh; Eric Kwasi Ofori
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  Benefits of and barriers to using patient-rated outcome measures in athletic training.

Authors:  Alison R Snyder Valier; Amy L Jennings; John T Parsons; Luzita I Vela
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Using Outcome Measures in Daily Practice: Development and Evaluation of an Implementation Strategy for Physiotherapists in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Guus M Meerhoff; Jan W H Custers; Roland P S van Peppen; Anna J H M Beurskens; Harriet Wittink
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 6.  The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward A S Duncan; Jennifer Murray
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Raymond A H M Swinkels; Roland P S van Peppen; Harriet Wittink; Jan W H Custers; Anna J H M Beurskens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  An exploratory qualitative study of health professional perspectives on clinical outcomes in UK orthotic practice.

Authors:  Natalie Hall; Daniel Parker; Anita Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  The patient's perspective of the feasibility of a patient-specific instrument in physiotherapy goal setting: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anita Stevens; Albine Moser; Albère Köke; Trudy van der Weijden; Anna Beurskens
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions.

Authors:  Tahani N Al-Muqiren; Einas S Al-Eisa; Ahmad H Alghadir; Shahnawaz Anwer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.