Literature DB >> 18847438

Population consequences of environmental sex reversal.

Samuel Cotton1, Claus Wedekind.   

Abstract

When sex determination in a species is predominantly genetic but environmentally reversible, exposure to (anthropogenic) changes in the environment can lead to shifts in a population's sex ratio. Such scenarios may be common in many fishes and amphibians, yet their ramifications remain largely unexplored. We used a simple model to study the (short-term) population consequences of environmental sex reversal (ESR). We examined the effects on sex ratios, sex chromosome frequencies, and population growth and persistence after exposure to environmental forces with feminizing or masculinizing tendencies. When environmental feminization was strong, X chromosomes were driven to extinction. Analogously, extinction of normally male-linked genetic factors (e.g., Y chromosomes) was caused by continuous environmental masculinization. Although moderate feminization was beneficial for population growth in the absence of large viability effects, our results suggest that the consequences of ESR are generally negative in terms of population size and the persistence of sex chromosomes. Extreme sex ratios resulting from high rates of ESR also reduced effective population sizes considerably. This may limit any evolutionary response to the deleterious effects of ESR. Our findings suggest that ESR changes population growth and sex ratios in some counter-intuitive ways and can change the predominant factor in sex determination from genetic to fully environmental, often within only a few tens of generations. Populations that lose genetic sex determination may quickly go extinct if the environmental forces that cause sex reversal cease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18847438     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01053.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  17 in total

1.  Biological response of high-back crucian carp (Carassius auratus) during different life stages to wastewater treatment plant effluent.

Authors:  Renmin Wang; Jingliang Liu; Xiaoxia Yang; Chan Lin; Bin Huang; Wei Jin; Xuejun Pan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Tackling the diversity of sex determination.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind; Rike B Stelkens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Heat-induced masculinization in domesticated zebrafish is family-specific and yields a set of different gonadal transcriptomes.

Authors:  Laia Ribas; Woei Chang Liew; Noèlia Díaz; Rajini Sreenivasan; László Orbán; Francesc Piferrer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Demographic and genetic consequences of disturbed sex determination.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Climate-driven shifts in adult sex ratios via sex reversals: the type of sex determination matters.

Authors:  Veronika Bókony; Szilvia Kövér; Edina Nemesházi; András Liker; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  High elevation increases the risk of Y chromosome loss in Alpine skink populations with sex reversal.

Authors:  Duminda S B Dissanayake; Clare E Holleley; Janine E Deakin; Arthur Georges
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Environmentally realistic exposure to the herbicide atrazine alters some sexually selected traits in male guppies.

Authors:  Kausalya Shenoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  An Experimental Test of Buffer Utility as a Technique for Managing Pool-Breeding Amphibians.

Authors:  Jessica S Veysey Powell; Kimberly J Babbitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal stability of an endemic Mexican treefrog.

Authors:  Griselda Cruz-Ruiz; Crystian S Venegas-Barrera; Hermilo Sanchez-Sanchez; Javier Manjarrez
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Fish populations surviving estrogen pollution.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.