Literature DB >> 1884723

Evaluation of a prescription based record-linkage model for epidemiological studies of long-term adverse effects of drugs--with special regard to combined oral contraceptives.

I Persson1, H O Adami, S E Norell, B Westerholm, B E Wiholm.   

Abstract

The Department of Drugs of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare undertook a study of the possibilities of a new scheme for post-marketing surveillance by means of prescription and register based epidemiological studies, primarily of combined oral contraceptives (COC). Based on available data on COC usage patterns and incidence rates of the disease at study, it was estimated that study periods, including the necessary time periods for disease development and generation of a sufficient number of cases, would amount to at least 1 to 13 years for cardiovascular outcomes and 8 to 17 years for reproductive cancers. Prospective and unbiased exposure ascertainment would be the most important advantage. However, delay in follow up, the need for extensive individual questionnaire probing and fear of violation of personal integrity could adversely affect the feasibility of the scheme. Chiefly on the grounds of the extended study periods and magnitude of the necessary infrastructure, it was not judged cost-effective to pursue such a scheme for COC exposure only. It was, however, suggested that it would be considered for epidemiological surveillance of other drugs that are commonly used and for which short term and frequent serious side effects are expected, as for instance lipid lowering compounds, beta-blockers, bensodiazepines and other psychotropic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1884723     DOI: 10.1007/bf00315228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  15 in total

Review 1.  Potential for bias in case-control studies of oral contraceptives and breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Skegg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The rationale for a post-marketing surveillance.

Authors:  B Westerholm
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Clinical pharmacology. Drug monitoring.

Authors:  D C Moir
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-02-21

4.  An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions.

Authors:  J T Casagrande; M C Pike
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease (first of two parts).

Authors:  B V Stadel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease (second of two parts).

Authors:  B V Stadel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Oral contraceptives, venous thrombosis, and varicose veins. Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1978-07

8.  Cancer of the liver and the use of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  D Forman; T J Vincent; R Doll
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-05-24

9.  Oral contraceptive use and the risk of ovarian cancer. The Centers for Disease Control Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer in young women. A joint national case-control study in Sweden and Norway.

Authors:  O Meirik; E Lund; H O Adami; R Bergström; T Christoffersen; P Bergsjö
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-09-20       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.