Literature DB >> 18846452

Why are some ectopic pregnancies characterized as pregnancies of unknown location at the initial transvaginal ultrasound examination?

Emma Kirk1, Anneleen Daemen, Aris T Papageorghiou, Cecilia Bottomley, George Condous, Bart De Moor, Dirk Timmerman, Tom Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the appearance and behavior of ectopic pregnancies (EPs) initially classified as pregnancies of unknown location (PULs) to those visualized on the initial transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVS).
METHODS: An observational study over a four-year period on women undergoing a TVS prior to diagnosis of a tubal EP. Demographic details, presenting symptoms, TVS findings, serum hCG and progesterone levels were recorded at the time of the initial TVS and at the time of diagnosis of the EP in those initially classified as a PUL.
RESULTS: 411 women with a tubal EP underwent a TVS prior to treatment. In 85.9% (353/411) the EP was visualized on the initial TVS while 14.1%(58/411) were initially classified as PULs. Those initially classified as PULs had significantly lower mean gestational age and mean initial human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels, and significantly higher mean progesterone level at presentation than those where the EP was visualized on the initial TVS. Of those with a PUL, 60.3% (35/58) had the EP subsequently visualized on TVS. At the time of diagnosis these EPs were significantly smaller (p<0.0001); the appearance of the EPs, serum hCG and progesterone levels at the time of visualization on TVS were not significantly different from those visualized on the initial TVS.
CONCLUSION: In women with EPs who are initially classified as PULs, failure of visualization of the EP on the initial TVS is likely to be due to the fact that they are too small and probably too early in the disease process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18846452     DOI: 10.1080/00016340802443822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  9 in total

1.  The clinical performance of the M4 decision support model to triage women with a pregnancy of unknown location as at low or high risk of complications.

Authors:  S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  The potential value of activin B and fibronectin for the triage of pregnancies of unknown location and prediction of first trimester viability.

Authors:  Maya Al-Memar; Shabnam Bobdiwala; Mayank Madhra; Srdjan Saso; Bavo De Cock; Ben Van Calster; Jeremy K Brown; Faizah Mukri; Cecilia Bottomley; Aris Papageorghiou; Dirk Timmerman; Andrew W Horne; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Simon Winder; Shannon Reid; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  The term "pregnancy of unknown location" is here to stay.

Authors:  George Condous; Simon Winder; Shannon Reid
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

5.  Exosomal MicroRNAs in Serum as Potential Biomarkers for Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jianhua Sun; Gaopi Deng; Xiaofeng Ruan; Si Chen; Huiyan Liao; Xiaorong Liu; Jing Li; Guang Zhao; Jie Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A spontaneous bilateral tubal pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Hong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Predictive analytical model for ectopic pregnancy diagnosis: Statistics vs. machine learning.

Authors:  Ploywarong Rueangket; Kristsanamon Rittiluechai; Akara Prayote
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Gynecological emergency ultrasound in daytime and at night: differences that cannot be ignored.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Jin; Yi-Zhen Gong; Yan Ma; Zhong-Hui He
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Characteristics of online medical care consultation for pregnant women during the COVID-19 outbreak: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Miaomiao Chen; Xiyao Liu; Jun Zhang; Guoqiang Sun; Ying Gao; Yuan Shi; Philip Baker; Jing Zeng; Yangxi Zheng; Xin Luo; Hongbo Qi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.