Literature DB >> 18846033

Updated recommendations for isolation of persons with mumps.

.   

Abstract

Mumps, an acute vaccine-preventable viral illness transmitted by respiratory droplets and saliva, has an incubation period most commonly of 16-18 days. The classic clinical presentation of mumps is parotitis, which can be preceded by several days of nonspecific prodromal symptoms; however, mumps also can be asymptomatic, especially in young children. Mumps transmission can occur from persons with subclinical or clinical infections and during the prodromal or symptomatic phases of illness. In 2006, during a mumps resurgence in the United States, the latest national recommendations from CDC and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) stipulated that persons with mumps be maintained in isolation with standard precautions and droplet precautions for 9 days after onset of parotitis. However, the existence of conflicting guidance (i.e., that the infectious period of mumps extended through the fourth day after parotitis onset) led to confusion regarding the appropriate length of isolation. In addition, during the 2006 resurgence, compliance with recommendations for isolation in university settings was substantially lower for 9 days (65%) compared with 4-5 days (86%). In 2007, after a review of the evidence supporting the 9-day isolation guidance by AAP and CDC, AAP changed its isolation guidance for health-care workers in ambulatory settings from 9 days to 5 days. In February 2008, after review of data on mumps in health-care settings, mumps viral load, and mumps virus isolation, the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) approved changes in its recommendations related to mumps in in-patient settings. As a result, CDC, AAP, and HICPAC all now recommend a 5-day period after onset of parotitis, both for isolation of persons with mumps in either community or health-care settings and for use of standard precautions and droplet precautions. This report summarizes the scientific basis for these changes in mumps isolation guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18846033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  7 in total

1.  Mumps: resurgence of a vanquished virus.

Authors:  Scott D Smith; Ian Gemmill
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity.

Authors:  Eugene Lam; Jennifer B Rosen; Jane R Zucker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Mumps Outbreaks in Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2010-01-04

4.  A path-specific SEIR model for use with general latent and infectious time distributions.

Authors:  Aaron T Porter; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Mumps in the Vaccination Age: Global Epidemiology and the Situation in Germany.

Authors:  Andrea-Ioana Beleni; Stefan Borgmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Mumps Virus: Modification of the Identify-Isolate-Inform Tool for Frontline Healthcare Providers.

Authors:  Kristi L Koenig; Siri Shastry; Bandr Mzahim; Abdulmajeed Almadhyan; Michael J Burns
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Measles, rubella, mumps and Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in saliva of vaccinated students of schools and universities in São Paulo City, Brazil.

Authors:  Barbara Carvalho Fialho Sampaio; Jaqueline Polizeli Rodrigues; Luciana Regina Meireles; Heitor Franco de Andrade Junior
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.257

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.