AIM: To prospectively explore the quality of the relationship between significant others and patients during lung cancer, based on the perceptions of the significant others. METHOD: In a sample of 91 significant others, longitudinal data were collected during the first year after diagnosis, and explored on group level and as individual patterns over time. RESULTS: Relational quality was skewed towards high quality, although 30% of the significant others reported low levels close to diagnosis. Forty-eight percent reported stability in the quality of their relationship during the disease trajectory. Within this group, 36% reported low levels of relational quality. Fifty-two percent reported change in quality of relationship and four typical patterns of change were identified. Two showed approximate linear changes in either a positive direction (15%) or a negative direction (49%), and two showed non-linear changes with a temporary ascending curve (11%) or a descending curve (26%). This implies that a change towards low levels of relational quality was most common. CONCLUSION: The present results show that illness may be a trigger for change in relational quality, which may have implications for future family-centred practice and research, since previously high relational quality has been linked to improved emotional well-being.
AIM: To prospectively explore the quality of the relationship between significant others and patients during lung cancer, based on the perceptions of the significant others. METHOD: In a sample of 91 significant others, longitudinal data were collected during the first year after diagnosis, and explored on group level and as individual patterns over time. RESULTS: Relational quality was skewed towards high quality, although 30% of the significant others reported low levels close to diagnosis. Forty-eight percent reported stability in the quality of their relationship during the disease trajectory. Within this group, 36% reported low levels of relational quality. Fifty-two percent reported change in quality of relationship and four typical patterns of change were identified. Two showed approximate linear changes in either a positive direction (15%) or a negative direction (49%), and two showed non-linear changes with a temporary ascending curve (11%) or a descending curve (26%). This implies that a change towards low levels of relational quality was most common. CONCLUSION: The present results show that illness may be a trigger for change in relational quality, which may have implications for future family-centred practice and research, since previously high relational quality has been linked to improved emotional well-being.
Authors: Melanie P J Schellekens; Desiree G M van den Hurk; Judith B Prins; Johan Molema; A Rogier T Donders; Willem H Woertman; Miep A van der Drift; Anne E M Speckens Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Karen Kane McDonnell; David G Gallerani; Brandi R Newsome; Otis L Owens; Jenay Beer; Amanda R Myren-Bennett; Elizabeth Regan; James W Hardin; Lisa A Webb Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2020 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.279