Literature DB >> 18845322

Evidence-based sex-related outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results of large multicenter study.

Mario I Fernández1, Shahrokh F Shariat, Vitaly Margulis, Christian Bolenz, Francesco Montorsi, Nazareno Suardi, Mesut Remzi, Christopher G Wood, Marco Roscigno, Eiji Kikuchi, Mototsugu Oya, Richard Zigeuner, Cord Langner, Alon Weizer, Yair Lotan, Theresa M Koppie, Jay D Raman, Pierre Karakiewicz, Pierre Karakiewizc, Karim Bensalah, Marcela Schultz, Pablo Bernier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the sex differences in the clinical and pathologic characteristics of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to determine the effect on prognosis after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in a large multicenter series.
METHODS: The records of 1363 patients who had undergone RNU were reviewed from the UTUC Collaboration database. The median follow-up was 47 months (range 0-250). The pathologic slides were re-evaluated by genitourinary pathologists unaware of the original findings from the slides and the clinical outcomes. The endpoints were freedom from tumor recurrence and disease-specific survival.
RESULTS: The male-to-female ratio was 2.1:1. The women were older than the men at diagnosis (70 +/- 11 vs 68 +/- 11 years; P < .001). No significant sex-related differences were found in the presence of symptoms at presentation (P = .70), pathologic stage (P = .98), tumor grade (P = .28), tumor architecture (P = .27), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = .42), presence of concomitant carcinoma in situ (P = .08), or the presence of lymph node metastases (P = .24). Recurrence developed in 379 patients (28%), and 313 patients (23%) died of their disease. Sex was not associated with disease recurrence (P = .07) or disease-specific survival (P = .13). An adjustment for the effects of the pathologic features did not change the lack of association of sex with the clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest series analyzing the effect of sex on the outcomes after RNU. No difference was found in the clinicopathologic features or prognosis between women and men treated with RNU for UTUC. The results of this large, international series show that RNU provides durable local control and disease-specific survival for both men and women with UTUC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18845322     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  17 in total

1.  Combining imaging and ureteroscopy variables in a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of muscle-invasive and non-organ confined disease in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Guilherme Godoy; Daher C Chade; Matthew Kaag; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  [Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. An update on clinical and pathological prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Axel S Merseburger; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 5.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Gender differences in radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Ricardo L Favaretto; Amit Gupta; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Thomas J Walton; Stefan Tritschler; Shiro Baba; Kazuhito Matsushita; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Wolfgang Otto; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Age-specific effect of gender on upper tract urothelial carcinoma outcomes.

Authors:  Jian-Ye Liu; Yong-Hong Li; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Yun-Lin Ye; Zhou-Wei Liu; Kai Yao; Pei Dong; Sheng-Jie Guo; Li-Juan Jiang; Ming-Zhu Zhong; Wei Chen; Hui Han; Zi-Ke Qin; Fang-Jian Zhou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  Risk stratification for kidney sparing procedure in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Zine-Eddine Khene; Romain Mathieu; Solène-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Thomas Seisen; Morgan Roupret; Shahrokh F Shariat; Benoit Peyronnet; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

9.  Clinicopathological spectrum and the outcome of treatment of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Surdas Radhakrishnan; Pallavi Aga; Manoj Jain; Aneesh Srivastava; Rakesh Kapoor; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04

10.  Clinicopathologic characteristics, therapy and outcomes of patients with primary ureteral small cell carcinoma: a case series and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Wenlong Zhong; Rongcheng Lin; Lei Zhang; Chengyue Jin; Xuesong Li; Qun He; Kan Gong; Zhisong He; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.