Literature DB >> 18845045

An evaluation of a rapid real time polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of group B streptococcus as part of a neonatal group B streptococcus prevention strategy.

Deborah Money1, Simon Dobson2, Lesley Cole3, Eda Karacabeyli3, Edith Blondel-Hill4, Ruth Milner5, Eva Thomas4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of a rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for group B streptococcus (GBS) completed during labour, compared with the standard culture test performed at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: Women presenting to the maternity unit for term vaginal delivery had two vaginal/rectal samples collected. One swab was tested using a rapid PCR method (IDI-Strep B, Infectio Diagnostic [IDI] Inc., Sainte-Foy QC ), and the other was cultured after enrichment (intrapartum culture). Comparisons were made between these results and those of a culture-based screen at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: Of the 190 women enrolled, 85% had results of the standard screen at 35 to 37 weeks available for comparison. The sensitivity and specificity of the standard 35- to 37-week screen were 84.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4-93.0) and 93.2% (95% CI 86.5-97.2) respectively, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid PCR were 90.7% (95% CI 79.7-96.9) and 97.6% (95% CI 93.1-99.5), respectively. The median reporting time for the rapid PCR test was 99 minutes (range 50-255). Results were available more than four hours before delivery in 81% of cases.
CONCLUSION: In this Canadian centre, a rapid PCR test done at the time of labour (IDI-Strep B) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to the 35- to 37-week screen. The time to reporting results was acceptably short, allowing for timely administration of intrapartum prophylactic antibiotics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18845045     DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32940-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  7 in total

Review 1.  Molecular-based screening for perinatal group B streptococcal infection: implications for prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Stéphane Emonet; Jacques Schrenzel; Begoña Martinez de Tejada
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Assessment of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset group B Streptococcal disease.

Authors:  Feng-Ying C Lin; Leonard E Weisman; Parvin Azimi; Amy E Young; Kathleen Chang; Mikhaela Cielo; Patricia Moyer; James F Troendle; Rachel Schneerson; John B Robbins
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 3.  Maternal and neonatal herpes simplex virus infections.

Authors:  Lawrence Corey; Anna Wald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  How can the microbiologist help in diagnosing neonatal sepsis?

Authors:  Michela Paolucci; Maria Paola Landini; Vittorio Sambri
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-26

5.  Comparison of BD MAX GBS and GenomEra GBS assays for rapid intrapartum PCR detection of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci.

Authors:  Trine Andreasen; Jens Kjølseth Møller; Mohammed Rohi Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Intrapartum PCR assay versus antepartum culture for assessment of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci in a Danish cohort at birth.

Authors:  Mohammed Rohi Khalil; Niels Uldbjerg; Poul Bak Thorsen; Jens Kjølseth Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women.

Authors:  Michele Berger Ferreira; Fernanda de-Paris; Rodrigo Minuto Paiva; Luciana de Souza Nunes
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.257

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.