Literature DB >> 18844642

Factors associated with the choice of delivery without epidural analgesia in women at low risk in France.

Camille Le Ray1, François Goffinet, Maryse Palot, Micheline Garel, Béatrice Blondel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia is used for three-fourths of the deliveries in France. Epidural analgesia during labor is supposed to be available to all women at low risk. The purpose of our study was to examine how the choice of delivery without an epidural varied in this context according to women's characteristics, prenatal care, and type of maternity unit.
METHODS: The 2003 National Perinatal Survey in France collected data about a representative sample of births. We selected 8,233 women who were at low risk and therefore should have been able to choose whether or not to deliver without epidural analgesia. Women were interviewed in the maternity unit after delivery. The factors associated with women's choice to deliver without epidural analgesia were studied with multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 2,720 women who gave birth without epidural analgesia, 37 percent reported that they had not wanted one; other reasons were labor occurring too quickly (43.9%), medical contraindication (3.3%), and unavailability of an anesthesiologist (2.8%). The reported decision to deliver without epidural analgesia was closely associated with high parity. It was also more frequent among women in an unfavorable social situation (not cohabiting, no or low-qualified job) and among women who gave birth in non-university public hospitals, in small- or medium-sized maternity units, and in maternity units without an anesthesiologist always on site.
CONCLUSIONS: Unfavorable social situation and organizational factors are associated with the reported choice to give birth without epidural analgesia. This finding suggests that women are not always in a position to make a real choice. It would be useful to improve the understanding of how pregnant women define their preferences and to know how these preferences change during pregnancy and labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18844642     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00237.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  16 in total

1.  Patient and provider perceptions of decision making about use of epidural analgesia during childbirth: a thematic analysis.

Authors:  Holly Bianca Goldberg; Allison Shorten
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

2.  Factors associated with women's preferences for labor epidural analgesia in Singapore: a survey approach.

Authors:  Chin Wen Tan; Semra Ozdemir; Rehena Sultana; Claire Tan; Hon Sen Tan; Ban Leong Sng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Managing the pain of labour: factors associated with the use of labour pain management for pregnant Australian women.

Authors:  Amie Steel; Jon Adams; David Sibbritt; Alex Broom; Cindy Gallois; Jane Frawley
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Differences between patient and provider perceptions of informed decision making about epidural analgesia use during childbirth.

Authors:  Holly Bianca Goldberg; Allison Shorten
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

5.  Ethnic differences in the use of intrapartum epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Alberto Jiménez-Puente; Nicolás Benítez-Parejo; Jorge Del Diego-Salas; Francisco Rivas-Ruiz; Claudio Maañón-Di Leo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?

Authors:  Charlotte Overgaard; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Pain acceptance and personal control in pain relief in two maternity care models: a cross-national comparison of Belgium and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wendy Christiaens; Mieke Verhaeghe; Piet Bracke
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Survey of the Factors Associated with a Woman's Choice to Have an Epidural for Labor Analgesia.

Authors:  Jennifer Harkins; Brendan Carvalho; Amy Evers; Sachin Mehta; Edward T Riley
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-06-29

Review 9.  Neuraxial analgesia: a review of its effects on the outcome and duration of labor.

Authors:  Hoon Jung; Kyung-Hwa Kwak
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-11-29

10.  Dutch women in midwife-led care at the onset of labour: which pain relief do they prefer and what do they use?

Authors:  Trudy Klomp; Ank de Jonge; Eileen K Hutton; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.