Literature DB >> 18842684

The potential effects on fracture outcomes of improvements in persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates.

S Rietbrock1, M Olson, T P van Staa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic fractures are a substantial public health burden worldwide. Evidence from studies show that treatments, such as bisphosphonates, which reduce the risk of fractures when taken regularly and long term, are being used irregularly and suboptimally. The objective of this study was to quantify the additional number of hip fractures prevented by improving persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates.
METHODS: The study population included patients prescribed alendronate or risedronate in the UK General Practice Research Database. Individualized probabilities of fracture and death during bisphosphonate therapy and of treatment persistence and compliance were estimated by age, gender, dosage, calendar year and clinical risk factors using Cox regression. Persistence was calculated by measuring repeat prescribing and compliance by estimating the medication possession ratio. A unique patient-based decision model was then developed using these probabilities. By varying the persistence and compliance probabilities in the simulation, the fracture outcomes with different scenarios were then evaluated. The outcomes were simulated over a 4-year period (maximum of three years of bisphosphonate use followed by 1 year of offset). It was assumed that the bisphosphonate users had experienced similar fracture reductions as observed in clinical trials.
RESULTS: The study population included 44 531 patients. Modelling showed that improvement of the 3-year persistence by 10% (over current persistence) would prevent an additional 14.4 hip fractures per 10 000 patients with weekly treatment. If weekly was substituted with yearly treatment (refill once a year), an additional 68.4 hip fractures (per 10 000 patients) would be prevented. If 3-year persistence improved by 10% with yearly treatment, an additional 78.5 hip fractures would be prevented compared to monthly bisphosphonates. The effects of this substitution were largest in elderly patients and in women.
CONCLUSION: Improvements in treatment persistence and compliance may improve the impact of bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of fractures. Yearly administration may also improve the impact on fracture risk reduction, unless long-term persistence is substantially reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18842684     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcn130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  9 in total

1.  Methods to examine the impact of compliance to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy on fracture risk: systematic review and recommendations.

Authors:  Milica Nikitovic; Daniel H Solomon; Suzanne M Cadarette
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Clinical experience with intravenous zoledronic acid in the treatment of male osteoporosis: evidence and opinions.

Authors:  Ieva Ruza; Sasan Mirfakhraee; Eric Orwoll; Ugis Gruntmanis
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in postmenopausal women intermittently treated with oral bisphosphonates: the BRAVO study.

Authors:  Ki Won Oh; Deog-Yoon Kim; Yil-Seob Lee; Moo Il Kang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapies: role and determinants of "spot therapy".

Authors:  L Tafaro; G Nati; E Leoni; R Baldini; M S Cattaruzza; M Mei; P Falaschi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture® Best Practice Framework tool.

Authors:  M K Javaid; C Kyer; P J Mitchell; J Chana; C Moss; M H Edwards; A R McLellan; J Stenmark; D D Pierroz; M C Schneider; J A Kanis; K Akesson; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (2020).

Authors:  Rosa M R Pereira; Mariana O Perez; Ana Patrícia Paula; Caio Moreira; Charlles H M Castro; Cristiano A F Zerbini; Diogo S Domiciano; Elaine de Azevedo; Laura M C Mendonca; Marcia Midore Shinzato; Marco Antonio A da Rocha-Loures; Sebastião Radominski; Vera L Szejnfeld
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Fatoye; P Smith; T Gebrye; G Yeowell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Health technology assessment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickael Hiligsmann; John A Kanis; Juliet Compston; Cyrus Cooper; Bruno Flamion; Pierre Bergmann; Jean-Jacques Body; Steven Boonen; Olivier Bruyere; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Favorable therapeutic response of osteoporosis patients to treatment with intravenous zoledronate compared with oral alendronate.

Authors:  Mohammed M Al-Bogami; Mohammed A Alkhorayef; Jonas Bystrom; Olufunso A Akanle; Nasra K Al-Adhoubi; Ali S Jawad; Rizgar A Mageed
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.484

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.