Literature DB >> 18840012

Deleterious outcomes after abrupt transition from insulin glargine to insulin detemir in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Udaya M Kabadi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Iowa Care (Iowa Medicaid), USA, switched insulin glargine to insulin detemir in subjects with diabetes mellitus without the approval of healthcare providers. This study set out to examine the impact of transition on parameters of diabetes management in type 1 diabetes.
METHODS: This was a retrospective review of the records of subjects with type 1 diabetes up to August 2007 in whom transition occurred. Subjects completing 6 months of insulin detemir therapy were included. Twenty-four subjects switching from insulin glargine to insuline detemir (group 1) fulfilled the duration with insulin detemir. Glycaemic control (glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c]), bodyweight, daily insulin dose (units), total and insulin glargine or insulin detemir and rapid-acting insulin aspart and hypoglycaemic events during the last 4 weeks, pre-switch and again at 6 months post-switch were assessed. Records of 21 age-matched subjects and continuing insulin glargine for 6 months (group 2) were examined. Subjects switched from insulin glargine to insulin detemir in the same daily dose. The daily doses of insulin detemir and aspart in group 1 were adjusted by telephone weekly based on blood glucose monitoring until stabilization occurred. Subjects were followed up in the outpatient clinic every 3 months.
RESULTS: Subjects in group 1 changed to insulin detemir twice a day because of a significant rise in hypoglycaemia with the daily dose used once a day. Glycaemic control remained stable on continuing insulin glargine; HbA1c 7.6+/-0.3 to 7.8+/-0.3%, while it worsened on switching to insulin detemir; HbA1c 7.9+/-0.6 to 8.8+/-0.8 despite a higher daily dose; insulin detemir 46+/-9 U/day versus pre-switch insulin glargine 36+/-8 U/day and group 2 insulin glargine 35+/-6 U/day; and greater total insulin dose: 80+/-12 U/day versus 68+/-10 pre-switch and group 2 insulin glargine 62+/-10 U/day (p<0.05 for all comparisons). Bodyweight and hypoglycaemic events were not significantly different pre- and post-switch.
CONCLUSION: Switching to insulin detemir from glargine is likely to result in lapse of glycaemic control despite a higher daily insulin dose, increased number of injections and need for frequent evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18840012     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200828110-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  11 in total

1.  Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study.

Authors:  A I Adler; I M Stratton; H A Neil; J S Yudkin; D R Matthews; C A Cull; A D Wright; R C Turner; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

2.  Insulin detemir under steady-state conditions: no accumulation and constant metabolic effect over time with twice daily administration in subjects with Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S Bott; C Tusek; L V Jacobsen; L Endahl; E Draeger; C Kapitza; T Heise
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in subjects with Type 1 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy.

Authors:  T R Pieber; H-C Treichel; B Hompesch; A Philotheou; L Mordhorst; M-A Gall; L I Robertson
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomised controlled trial (UKPDS 41). United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group.

Authors:  A Gray; M Raikou; A McGuire; P Fenn; R Stevens; C Cull; I Stratton; A Adler; R Holman; R Turner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-20

5.  Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir in clinical practice: 14-week follow-up data from type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients in the PREDICTIVE European cohort.

Authors:  A Dornhorst; H-J Lüddeke; S Sreenan; C Koenen; J B Hansen; A Tsur; L Landstedt-Hallin
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Health economic benefits and quality of life during improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  M A Testa; D C Simonson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study.

Authors:  Y Ohkubo; H Kishikawa; E Araki; T Miyata; S Isami; S Motoyoshi; Y Kojima; N Furuyoshi; M Shichiri
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Diabetic complications. The importance of glucose control.

Authors:  J S Skyler
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.741

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Comparative Dosing and Glycemic Control of Intermediate and Long-Acting Insulins in Adult Patients With Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Anna Kabakov; Andrew Merker
Journal:  J Pharm Technol       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 2.  Insulin detemir: a review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and insulin detemir with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving intensive insulin therapy.

Authors:  Bumin Nuri Dündar; Nihal Dündar; Erdal Eren
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-04

4.  Therapeutically interchangeable? A study of real-world outcomes associated with switching basal insulin analogues among US patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using electronic medical records data.

Authors:  P Levin; W Wei; R Miao; F Ye; L Xie; O Baser; J Gill
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.577

5.  Influence of the type of Basal insulin and other variables on clinical outcomes in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ruth M Garrison; Jeremy L Johnson; Michelle E Condren; Kevin C Farmer; David H Jelley
Journal:  ISRN Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-06

6.  Effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine versus detemir analysis in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thales B C Silva; Paulo H R F Almeida; Vania E Araújo; Francisco de Assis Acurcio; Augusto A Guerra Júnior; Brian Godman; Juliana Alvares
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.565

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.