Literature DB >> 18839762

Evaluating the sources of potential migrant species: implications under climate change.

Inés Ibáñez1, James S Clark, Michael C Dietze.   

Abstract

As changes in climate become more apparent, ecologists face the challenge of predicting species responses to the new conditions. Most forecasts are based on climate envelopes (CE), correlative approaches that project future distributions on the basis of the current climate often assuming some dispersal lag. One major caveat with this approach is that it ignores the complexity of factors other than climate that contribute to a species' distributional range. To overcome this limitation and to complement predictions based on CE modeling we carried out a transplant experiment of resident and potential-migrant species. Tree seedlings of 18 species were planted side by side from 2001 to 2004 at several locations in the Southern Appalachians and in the North Carolina Piedmont (U.S.A.). Growing seedlings under a large array of environmental conditions, including those forecasted for the next decades, allowed us to model seedling survival as a function of variables characteristic of each site, and from here we were able to make predictions on future seedling recruitment. In general, almost all species showed decreased survival in plots and years with lower soil moisture, including both residents and potential migrants, and in both locations, the Southern Appalachians and the Piedmont. The detrimental effects that anticipated arid conditions could have on seedling recruitment contradict some of the projections made by CE modeling, where many of the species tested are expected to increase in abundance or to expand their ranges. These results point out the importance of evaluating the potential sources of migrant species when modeling vegetation response to climate change, and considering that species adapted to the new climate and the local conditions may not be available in the surrounding regions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18839762     DOI: 10.1890/07-1594.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  12 in total

1.  Individual-scale inference to anticipate climate-change vulnerability of biodiversity.

Authors:  James S Clark; David M Bell; Matthew Kwit; Anne Stine; Ben Vierra; Kai Zhu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Quantifying how fine-grained environmental heterogeneity and genetic variation affect demography in an annual plant population.

Authors:  Andrew M Latimer; Brooke S Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Ecology and the ratchet of events: climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions.

Authors:  Stephen T Jackson; Julio L Betancourt; Robert K Booth; Stephen T Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Enemy release promotes range expansion in a host plant.

Authors:  Poppy Lakeman-Fraser; Robert M Ewers
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Non-climatic constraints on upper elevational plant range expansion under climate change.

Authors:  Carissa D Brown; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Elevation-dependent responses of tree mast seeding to climate change over 45 years.

Authors:  Robert B Allen; Jennifer M Hurst; Jeanne Portier; Sarah J Richardson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Moving forward in global-change ecology: capitalizing on natural variability.

Authors:  Inés Ibáñez; Elise S Gornish; Lauren Buckley; Diane M Debinski; Jessica Hellmann; Brian Helmuth; Janneke Hillerislambers; Andrew M Latimer; Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Maria Uriarte
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Potential impacts of climate change on insect communities: a transplant experiment.

Authors:  Sabine S Nooten; Nigel R Andrew; Lesley Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modeling Hawaiian ecosystem degradation due to invasive plants under current and future climates.

Authors:  Adam E Vorsino; Lucas B Fortini; Fred A Amidon; Stephen E Miller; James D Jacobi; Jonathan P Price; Sam 'ohukani'ohi'a Gon; Gregory A Koob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Plant bioclimatic models in climate change research.

Authors:  Chyi-Rong Chiou; Tung-Yu Hsieh; Chang-Chi Chien
Journal:  Bot Stud       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.