Lawrence Fong1, Eric J Small. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0511, USA. lfong@medicine.ucsf.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the emerging role of immunomodulatory antibodies in cancer treatment. Antibodies (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), an inhibitory molecule on T cells, represent the vanguard of these new drugs. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review of the clinical studies examining the clinical activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. We also review the potential mechanisms and toxicities associated with these treatments. RESULTS: Clinical activity with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has paved the way for additional T-cell immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody (mAb) approaches for the treatment of cancer to be investigated. Because anti-CTLA-4 mAbs target the immune system and not the tumor, they may provide significant potential advantages over traditional antitumor mAbs, chemotherapies, and immunotherapies (ie, vaccines and cytokines). Other antibodies, such as CD137 agonists, CD40 agonists, and PD-1 antagonists, are currently in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. CONCLUSION: Available clinical data suggest that anti-CTLA-4 mAbs are very different from traditional mAbs, chemotherapies, and immunotherapies in terms of patterns of response, duration of response, and adverse event profile. Ongoing clinical studies aim to establish the efficacy and safety of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and a variety of other cancer types.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the emerging role of immunomodulatory antibodies in cancer treatment. Antibodies (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), an inhibitory molecule on T cells, represent the vanguard of these new drugs. DESIGN: We performed a systematic review of the clinical studies examining the clinical activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. We also review the potential mechanisms and toxicities associated with these treatments. RESULTS: Clinical activity with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has paved the way for additional T-cell immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody (mAb) approaches for the treatment of cancer to be investigated. Because anti-CTLA-4 mAbs target the immune system and not the tumor, they may provide significant potential advantages over traditional antitumor mAbs, chemotherapies, and immunotherapies (ie, vaccines and cytokines). Other antibodies, such as CD137 agonists, CD40 agonists, and PD-1 antagonists, are currently in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. CONCLUSION: Available clinical data suggest that anti-CTLA-4 mAbs are very different from traditional mAbs, chemotherapies, and immunotherapies in terms of patterns of response, duration of response, and adverse event profile. Ongoing clinical studies aim to establish the efficacy and safety of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and a variety of other cancer types.
Authors: Brendan D Curti; Magdalena Kovacsovics-Bankowski; Nicholas Morris; Edwin Walker; Lana Chisholm; Kevin Floyd; Joshua Walker; Iliana Gonzalez; Tanisha Meeuwsen; Bernard A Fox; Tarsem Moudgil; William Miller; Daniel Haley; Todd Coffey; Brenda Fisher; Laurie Delanty-Miller; Nicole Rymarchyk; Tracy Kelly; Todd Crocenzi; Eric Bernstein; Rachel Sanborn; Walter J Urba; Andrew D Weinberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lana E Kandalaft; Nathan Singh; John B Liao; Andrea Facciabene; Jonathan S Berek; Daniel J Powell; George Coukos Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 5.482