Literature DB >> 18838489

The views of patients with advanced cancer regarding participation in serial questionnaire studies.

C Shipman1, M Hotopf, A Richardson, S Murray, J Koffman, R Harding, P Speck, I J Higginson.   

Abstract

Longitudinal research helps to clarify changing needs and the timing of treatments and referral but is hampered by poor recruitment and retention of participants. We explored, using semi-structured interviews in a cross-sectional design, the views and preferences of patients with advanced cancer on taking part in planned longitudinal questionnaire-based research studies. Patients with advanced lung and colorectal cancer were recruited from outpatient clinics in a London hospital. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken to explore their views about taking part in a specific future questionnaire study and their preferences regarding format. In all, 20 of 47 patients initially identified were recruited. Their preferences for the planned questionnaire study were for face-to-face interviews undertaken at home from late morning onwards with recontact at a mean of 6 weeks. Fluctuating symptom control needs could result in unexpected admission to or discharge from hospital. Developing flexible and responsive recruitment procedures is vital to retain patient participation as more than one contact might be required to successfully conclude an interview.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18838489     DOI: 10.1177/0269216308098087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  5 in total

1.  Cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions on the best time in secondary care to approach patients for recruitment to longitudinal questionnaire-based research.

Authors:  Laura Ashley; Helen Jones; Galina Velikova; Penny Wright
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Participation of older newly-diagnosed cancer patients in an observational prospective pilot study: an example of recruitment and retention.

Authors:  Martine T E Puts; Johanne Monette; Veronique Girre; Christina Wolfson; Michele Monette; Gerald Batist; Howard Bergman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  The effects of cancer research participation on patient experience: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  L McGrath-Lone; H Ward; C Schoenborn; S Day
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Marjolein H Gysels; Catherine Evans; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 5.  A critical analysis of the implementation of service user involvement in primary care research and health service development using normalization process theory.

Authors:  Edel Tierney; Rachel McEvoy; Mary O'Reilly-de Brún; Tomas de Brún; Ekaterina Okonkwo; Michelle Rooney; Chris Dowrick; Anne Rogers; Anne MacFarlane
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.