OBJECTIVE: Clonal marrow cells from patients with early myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergo apoptosis in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Cells from advanced MDS are resistant to TRAIL. Two isoforms of the Flice inhibitory protein (FLIP) short (FLIPS) and FLIP long (FLIPL), which modulate TRAIL signals, showed disease-stage-dependent differential regulation. Therefore, we aimed at characterizing potential differential effects of FLIPL and FLIPS, on TRAIL and TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in model leukemic cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using lentiviral constructs, FLIPL and FLIPS, as well as a green fluorescent protein control were overexpressed in ML-1 cells, which constitutively express very low levels of FLIP and are highly sensitive to apoptosis induction. Cells were then exposed to TRAIL or TNF-alpha, and effects on the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways of apoptosis induction were assessed. RESULTS: Overexpression of FLIP reduced TRAIL and TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in ML-1 cells. However, while FLIPL completely abrogated apoptosis, FLIPS allowed for BID cleavage and caspase-3 activation. Concurrently, there was a decline of Bcl-xL and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) in FLIPS cells followed by apoptosis. Further, inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) activation in TNF-alpha-treated cells resulted in profound apoptosis in FLIPS, but not in FLIPL-overexpressing cells, consistent with the observations in patients with early stage MDS. Inhibition of NF-kappaB had only minimal effects on TRAIL signaling. CONCLUSION: Thus, FLIPL and FLIPS exerted differential effects in myeloid leukemic cell lines in response to TRAIL and TNF-alpha. It might be possible to therapeutically exploit those differences with effector molecules specific for the FLIP isoforms.
OBJECTIVE: Clonal marrow cells from patients with early myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergo apoptosis in response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Cells from advanced MDS are resistant to TRAIL. Two isoforms of the Flice inhibitory protein (FLIP) short (FLIPS) and FLIP long (FLIPL), which modulate TRAIL signals, showed disease-stage-dependent differential regulation. Therefore, we aimed at characterizing potential differential effects of FLIPL and FLIPS, on TRAIL and TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in model leukemic cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using lentiviral constructs, FLIPL and FLIPS, as well as a green fluorescent protein control were overexpressed in ML-1 cells, which constitutively express very low levels of FLIP and are highly sensitive to apoptosis induction. Cells were then exposed to TRAIL or TNF-alpha, and effects on the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways of apoptosis induction were assessed. RESULTS: Overexpression of FLIP reduced TRAIL and TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis in ML-1 cells. However, while FLIPL completely abrogated apoptosis, FLIPS allowed for BID cleavage and caspase-3 activation. Concurrently, there was a decline of Bcl-xL and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) in FLIPS cells followed by apoptosis. Further, inhibition of nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) activation in TNF-alpha-treated cells resulted in profound apoptosis in FLIPS, but not in FLIPL-overexpressing cells, consistent with the observations in patients with early stage MDS. Inhibition of NF-kappaB had only minimal effects on TRAIL signaling. CONCLUSION: Thus, FLIPL and FLIPS exerted differential effects in myeloid leukemic cell lines in response to TRAIL and TNF-alpha. It might be possible to therapeutically exploit those differences with effector molecules specific for the FLIP isoforms.
Authors: H Walczak; R E Miller; K Ariail; B Gliniak; T S Griffith; M Kubin; W Chin; J Jones; A Woodward; T Le; C Smith; P Smolak; R G Goodwin; C T Rauch; J C Schuh; D H Lynch Journal: Nat Med Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: A Srinivasan; F Li; A Wong; L Kodandapani; R Smidt; J F Krebs; L C Fritz; J C Wu; K J Tomaselli Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1998-02-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: M Kitagawa; I Saito; T Kuwata; S Yoshida; S Yamaguchi; M Takahashi; T Tanizawa; R Kamiyama; K Hirokawa Journal: Leukemia Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: G M Gersuk; C Beckham; M R Loken; P Kiener; J E Anderson; A Farrand; A B Troutt; J A Ledbetter; H J Deeg Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Elaine M Sloand; J Joseph Melenhorst; Zachary C G Tucker; Loretta Pfannes; Jason M Brenchley; Agnes Yong; Valeria Visconte; Colin Wu; Emma Gostick; Phillip Scheinberg; Matthew J Olnes; Daniel C Douek; David A Price; A John Barrett; Neal S Young Journal: Blood Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Gustav J Ullenhag; Ahmad Al-Attar; Abhik Mukherjee; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Lindy G Durrant Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Marco Ragusa; Giuseppe Avola; Rosario Angelica; Davide Barbagallo; Maria Rosa Guglielmino; Laura R Duro; Alessandra Majorana; Luisa Statello; Loredana Salito; Carla Consoli; Maria Grazia Camuglia; Cinzia Di Pietro; Giuseppe Milone; Michele Purrello Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: C Giampietri; S Petrungaro; P Coluccia; F Antonangeli; K Giannakakis; T Faraggiana; A Filippini; G Cossu; E Ziparo Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Xiang Li; Feng Xu; ChunKang Chang; John Byon; Thalia Papayannopoulou; H Joachim Deeg; A Mario Marcondes Journal: Haematologica Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 9.941