Literature DB >> 18838138

The vector of jaw muscle force as determined by computer-generated three dimensional simulation: a test of Greaves' model.

Philip Clausen1, Stephen Wroe, Colin McHenry, Karen Moreno, Jason Bourke.   

Abstract

We present results from a detailed three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cranium and mandible of the Australian dingo (Canis lupus dingo) during a range of feeding activities and compare results with predictions based on two-dimensional methodology [Greaves, W.S., 2000. Location of the vector of jaw muscle force in mammals. Journal of Morphology 243, 293-299]. Greaves showed that the resultant muscle vector intersects the mandible line slightly posterior to the lower third molar (m3). Our work demonstrates that this is qualitatively correct, although the actual point is closer to the jaw joint. We show that it is theoretically possible for the biting side of the mandible to dislocate during unilateral biting; however, the bite point needs to be posterior to m3. Simulations show that reduced muscle activation on the non-biting side can considerably diminish the likelihood of dislocation with only a minor decrease in bite force during unilateral biting. By modulating muscle recruitment the animal may be able to maximise bite force whilst minimising the risk of dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18838138     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Paranthropus boisei.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Peter W Lucas; Shaji Michael; Ali Shekeban; Khaled Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Richard H Madden; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; Sarah Wood; Christine Dzialo; Michael A Berthaume; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  The craniomandibular mechanics of being human.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; Toni L Ferrara; Colin R McHenry; Darren Curnoe; Uphar Chamoli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Beware the black box: investigating the sensitivity of FEA simulations to modelling factors in comparative biomechanics.

Authors:  Christopher W Walmsley; Matthew R McCurry; Phillip D Clausen; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Virtual reconstruction and prey size preference in the mid Cenozoic thylacinid, Nimbacinus dicksoni (Thylacinidae, Marsupialia).

Authors:  Marie R G Attard; William C H Parr; Laura A B Wilson; Michael Archer; Suzanne J Hand; Tracey L Rogers; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Why the long face? The mechanics of mandibular symphysis proportions in crocodiles.

Authors:  Christopher W Walmsley; Peter D Smits; Michelle R Quayle; Matthew R McCurry; Heather S Richards; Christopher C Oldfield; Stephen Wroe; Phillip D Clausen; Colin R McHenry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The anatomy of a crushing bite: The specialised cranial mechanics of a giant extinct kangaroo.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.