Literature DB >> 18837619

Interpretation bias in social anxiety as detected by event-related brain potentials.

Jason S Moser1, Greg Hajcak2, Jonathan D Huppert3, Edna B Foa3, Robert F Simons1.   

Abstract

Little is known about psychophysiological correlates of interpretation bias in social anxiety. To address this issue, the authors measured event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in high and low socially anxious individuals during a task wherein ambiguous scenarios were resolved with either a positive or negative ending. Specifically, the authors examined modulations of the P600, an ERP that peaks approximately 600 ms following stimulus onset and indexes violations of expectancy. Low-anxious individuals were characterized by an increased P600 to negative in comparison with positive sentence endings, suggesting a positive interpretation bias. In contrast, the high-anxious group evidenced equivalent P600 magnitude for negative and positive sentence endings, suggesting a lack of positive interpretation bias. Similar, but less reliable results emerged in earlier time windows, that is, 200-500 ms poststimulus. Reaction time, occurring around 900 ms poststimulus, failed to show a reliable interpretation bias. Results suggest that ERPs can detect interpretation biases in social anxiety before the emission of behavioral responses. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18837619     DOI: 10.1037/a0013173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  10 in total

Review 1.  A parent-child interactional model of social anxiety disorder in youth.

Authors:  Thomas H Ollendick; Kristy E Benoit
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-03

2.  Negative expectancies in posttraumatic stress disorder: neurophysiological (N400) and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Matthew Kimble; Laura Batterink; Elizabeth Marks; Cordelia Ross; Kevin Fleming
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Amygdala and insula response to emotional images in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Sabin G Shah; Heide Klumpp; Mike Angstadt; Pradeep J Nathan; K Luan Phan
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  How awkward! Social anxiety and the perceived consequences of social blunders.

Authors:  David A Moscovitch; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Benjamin D Hesch
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2011-11-18

5.  Interpretation training in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nader Amir; Charles T Taylor
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-01-16

6.  The role of implicit theories in mental health symptoms, emotion regulation, and hypothetical treatment choices in college students.

Authors:  Hans S Schroder; Sindes Dawood; Matthew M Yalch; M Brent Donnellan; Jason S Moser
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2014-11-02

7.  Neurophysiological Processing of an Emotional Task is Sensitive to Time-of-Day.

Authors:  Isaac Chayo; Mercedes Fernandez; Samantha Sandor; Jaime L Tartar
Journal:  J Circadian Rhythms       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 8.  A Systematic Review of Experimental Paradigms for Exploring Biased Interpretation of Ambiguous Information with Emotional and Neutral Associations.

Authors:  Daniel E Schoth; Christina Liossi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-09

9.  Face-to-face versus Video Teleconference Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Anxiety and Related Disorders: A Preliminary Comparison.

Authors:  Irena Milosevic; Duncan H Cameron; Melissa Milanovic; Randi E McCabe; Karen Rowa
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.321

10.  Slow Is Also Fast: Feedback Delay Affects Anxiety and Outcome Evaluation.

Authors:  Xukai Zhang; Yi Lei; Hang Yin; Peng Li; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.