Literature DB >> 18837611

Moral hypervigilance: the influence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain.

Andrew Jones1, Julie Fitness.   

Abstract

Evidence exists that immoral behavior can elicit disgust. The authors thus proposed that highly disgust-sensitive individuals would be particularly repelled by exposure to transgressors and, consequently, would think and behave in ways aimed at reducing the risk of such exposure occurring--a syndrome the authors call moral hypervigilance. To examine these ideas, the authors began in Study 1 by testing the notion that people are disgusted by moral deviants. Evidence was found that participants exposed to descriptions of criminals experienced disgust. Across 2 further studies, disgust sensitivity (DS) was found to be associated with phenomena indicative of moral hypervigilance. In Study 2, mock jurors high on DS were biased toward conviction. In Study 3, DS predicted several hypothesized outcomes: higher estimates of the probability that suspects described in crime vignettes were culpable; a proclivity to attribute evilness to, and recommend lengthy sentences for, criminals; and inflated perceptions of community crime levels. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18837611     DOI: 10.1037/a0013435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  13 in total

1.  Moral Violations Reduce Oral Consumption.

Authors:  Cindy Chan; Leaf Van Boven; Eduardo B Andrade; Dan Ariely
Journal:  J Consum Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

2.  Neural basis of moral verdict and moral deliberation.

Authors:  Jana Schaich Borg; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong; Vince D Calhoun; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Pathogens and politics: further evidence that parasite prevalence predicts authoritarianism.

Authors:  Damian R Murray; Mark Schaller; Peter Suedfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Development of Disgust and Its Relationship to Adolescent Psychosocial Functioning.

Authors:  Rachel E Christensen; Michael Lewis
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2021-06-23

5.  Routes to embodiment.

Authors:  Anita Körner; Sascha Topolinski; Fritz Strack
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

6.  Interrelations of Justice, Rejection, Provocation, and Moral Disgust Sensitivity and Their Links with the Hostile Attribution Bias, Trait Anger, and Aggression.

Authors:  Rebecca Bondü; Philipp Richter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-30

7.  Individual Differences in Moral Disgust Do Not Predict Utilitarian Judgments, Sexual and Pathogen Disgust Do.

Authors:  Michael Laakasuo; Jukka Sundvall; Marianna Drosinou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  So Gross and Yet so Far Away: Psychological Distance Moderates the Effect of Disgust on Moral Judgment.

Authors:  Marius van Dijke; Gijs van Houwelingen; David De Cremer; Leander De Schutter
Journal:  Soc Psychol Personal Sci       Date:  2017-08-16

9.  Harming ourselves and defiling others: what determines a moral domain?

Authors:  Alek Chakroff; James Dungan; Liane Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How Can Prosocial Behavior Be Motivated? The Different Roles of Moral Judgment, Moral Elevation, and Moral Identity Among the Young Chinese.

Authors:  Wan Ding; Yanhong Shao; Binghai Sun; Ruibo Xie; Weijian Li; Xiaozhen Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.