Literature DB >> 18836984

The choices, choosing model of quality of life: description and rationale.

Barry J Gurland1, Roni V Gurland.   

Abstract

AIM: This introductory paper offers a critical review of current models and measures of quality of life, and describes a choices and choosing (c-c) process as a new model of quality of life.
METHOD: Criteria are proposed for judging the relative merits of models of quality of life with preference being given to explicit mechanisms, linkages to a science base, a means of identifying deficits amenable to rational restorative interventions, and with embedded values of the whole person. RESULT: A conjectured model, based on the processes of gaining access to choices and choosing among them, matches the proposed criteria. The c-c process is an evolved adaptive mechanism dedicated to the pursuit of quality of life, driven by specific biological and psychological systems, and influenced by social and environmental forces.
CONCLUSIONS: This model strengthens the science base for the field of quality of life, unifies approaches to concept and measurement, and guides the evaluation of impairments of quality of life. Corresponding interventions can be aimed at relieving restrictions or distortions of the c-c process; thus helping people to preserve and improve their quality of life. RELATED WORK: Companion papers detail relevant aspects of the science base, present methods of identifying deficits and distortions of the c-c model so as to open opportunities for rational restorative interventions, and explore empirical analyses of the relationship between health imposed restrictions of c-c and conventional indicators of diminished quality of life. [corrected] (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18836984     DOI: 10.1002/gps.2110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0885-6230            Impact factor:   3.485


  6 in total

1.  Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2011-04

2.  The Abrams geriatric self-neglect scale: introduction, validation and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Robert C Abrams; M Carrington Reid; Cynthia Lien; Maria Pavlou; Anthony Rosen; Nancy Needell; Joseph Eimicke; Jeanne Teresi
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 3.  What to Expect From the Evolving Field of Geriatric Cardiology.

Authors:  Susan P Bell; Nicole M Orr; John A Dodson; Michael W Rich; Nanette K Wenger; Kay Blum; John Gordon Harold; Mary E Tinetti; Mathew S Maurer; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Quality of life impacts on 16-year survival of an older ethnically diverse cohort.

Authors:  Barry Gurland; Jeanne A Teresi; Joseph P Eimicke; Mathew S Maurer; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Methodological issues in measuring subjective well-being and quality-of-life: Applications to assessment of affect in older, chronically and cognitively impaired, ethnically diverse groups using the Feeling Tone Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; John A Toner; Marjorie Kleinman; Mildred Ramirez; Joseph P Eimicke; Barry J Gurland; Albert Siu
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2017-04-04

6.  Health-related restrictions of choices and choosing: implications for quality of life and clinical interventions.

Authors:  Barry J Gurland; Huai Cheng; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2010-08-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.