Literature DB >> 18836896

Effect of less intensive rearing conditions on litter characteristics, growth performance, carcase injuries and meat quality of broilers.

A Meluzzi1, C Fabbri, E Folegatti, F Sirri.   

Abstract

1. The objective was to compare the effect of two litter types (wheat straw and wood shavings) and two different rearing conditions (Treated and Control) on welfare indicators, broiler performance, carcase injuries, particularly hock and foot pad dermatitis (FPD), litter characteristics and meat quality. 2. Treated conditions were characterised by a low stocking density (11 birds/m(2)), short photoperiod (16 h light: 8 h dark) and a large amount of litter (3 to 4.5 kg/m(2), respectively, for wheat straw or wood shavings). Control conditions were a high stocking density (14 birds/m(2)), long photoperiod (23 h light:1 h dark) and small amount of litter (2.3 to 3 kg/m(2), respectively, for wheat straw or wood shavings). In addition, the effects of two widely used litter materials, wheat straw and wood shavings, were investigated. 3. The combined effects of lower stocking density, greater amount of litter material and a photoperiod similar to the natural one, reduced the occurrence of FPD in Treated groups keeping the FPD score under the European threshold. 4. Improved rearing conditions led to faster growth rate associated with inferior feed efficiency, whereas litter type exerted negligible effects on broiler performance. 5. Litter moisture content, nitrogen and ammonia released by the litter were lower in Treated groups than Control groups. The use of wood shavings resulted in lower moisture and nitrogen concentrations in the litter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18836896     DOI: 10.1080/00071660802290424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  4 in total

1.  Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Alessandra De Cesare; Federico Sirri; Gerardo Manfreda; Paola Moniaci; Alberto Giardini; Marco Zampiga; Adele Meluzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effects of varying group sizes on performance, body defects, and productivity in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Musa Sarıca; Koray Karakoç; Kadir Erensoy
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Effects of Photoperiod on the Performance, Blood Profile, Welfare Parameters, and Carcass Characteristics in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Kim; Jiseon Son; Jin-Joo Jeon; Hyun-Soo Kim; Yeon-Seo Yun; Hwan-Ku Kang; Eui-Chul Hong; Ji-Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 4.  Potential contaminants and hazards in alternative chicken bedding materials and proposed guidance levels: a review.

Authors:  Priscilla F Gerber; Nic Gould; Eugene McGahan
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.