INTRODUCTION: The objective of treatment in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is reperfusion of the myocardium at risk. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of vessel masking on videodensitometric assessment of myocardial reperfusion. METHODS: Epicardial vessels were masked out from the densitometric region of interest, where average rise slope (G(max)/T(max)) of time-density curves (TDC) were measured. Measurements were tested to detect indicators of reperfusion as cumulative creatine-kinase (CK) release and ST-resolution by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: When vessel masking was applied before G(max)/T(max) measurement, an improvement has been observed in sensitivity and area under ROC curve to detect indicators of reperfusion as cumulative enzyme release (sensitivity (Se): 85% vs. 61%, area under the curve (AUC): 0.84 vs. 0.76) and ST-resolution (Se: 74% vs. 67%, AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Selective myocardial perfusion measurement on coronary angiograms is feasible and serves as an informative method to detect myocardial viability after AMI and revascularization therapy. The present study demonstrated that vessel masking improves results compared to simple densitometric analysis.
INTRODUCTION: The objective of treatment in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is reperfusion of the myocardium at risk. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of vessel masking on videodensitometric assessment of myocardial reperfusion. METHODS: Epicardial vessels were masked out from the densitometric region of interest, where average rise slope (G(max)/T(max)) of time-density curves (TDC) were measured. Measurements were tested to detect indicators of reperfusion as cumulative creatine-kinase (CK) release and ST-resolution by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: When vessel masking was applied before G(max)/T(max) measurement, an improvement has been observed in sensitivity and area under ROC curve to detect indicators of reperfusion as cumulative enzyme release (sensitivity (Se): 85% vs. 61%, area under the curve (AUC): 0.84 vs. 0.76) and ST-resolution (Se: 74% vs. 67%, AUC: 0.83 vs. 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Selective myocardial perfusion measurement on coronary angiograms is feasible and serves as an informative method to detect myocardial viability after AMI and revascularization therapy. The present study demonstrated that vessel masking improves results compared to simple densitometric analysis.
Authors: M Haude; G Caspari; D Baumgart; T Ehring; R Schulz; T Roth; L Koch; R Erbel; P Spiller; G Heusch Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: N H Pijls; G J Uijen; A Hoevelaken; T Arts; W R Aengevaeren; H S Bos; J H Fast; K L van Leeuwen; T van der Werf Journal: Circulation Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John J Young; David A Cox; Thomas Stuckey; Joseph Babb; Mark Turco; Alexandra J Lansky; Roxana Mehran; Gregg W Stone Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Abhiram Prasad; Gregg W Stone; Thomas D Stuckey; Costantino O Costantini; Peter J Zimetbaum; Michael McLaughlin; Roxana Mehran; Eulogio Garcia; James E Tcheng; David A Cox; Cindy L Grines; Alexandra J Lansky; Bernard J Gersh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Costantino O Costantini; Gregg W Stone; Roxana Mehran; Eve Aymong; Cindy L Grines; David A Cox; Thomas Stuckey; Mark Turco; Bernard J Gersh; James E Tcheng; Eulogio Garcia; John J Griffin; Giulio Guagliumi; Martin B Leon; Alexandra J Lansky Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-07-21 Impact factor: 24.094