Literature DB >> 18836571

Model fitting and inference under Latent Equilibrium Processes.

Sourabh Bhattacharya1, Alan E Gelfand, Kent E Holsinger.   

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for model fitting and inference in the context of Bayesian models of the type f(Y | X, theta)f(X | theta)f(theta), where Y is the (set of) observed data, theta is a set of model parameters and X is an unobserved (latent) stationary stochastic process induced by the first order transition model f(X((t+1)) | X((t)), theta), where X((t)) denotes the state of the process at time (or generation) t. The crucial feature of the above type of model is that, given theta, the transition model f(X((t+1)) | X((t)), theta) is known but the distribution of the stochastic process in equilibrium, that is f(X | theta), is, except in very special cases, intractable, hence unknown. A further point to note is that the data Y has been assumed to be observed when the underlying process is in equilibrium. In other words, the data is not collected dynamically over time.We refer to such specification as a latent equilibrium process (LEP) model. It is motivated by problems in population genetics (though other applications are discussed), where it is of interest to learn about parameters such as mutation and migration rates and population sizes, given a sample of allele frequencies at one or more loci. In such problems it is natural to assume that the distribution of the observed allele frequencies depends on the true (unobserved) population allele frequencies, whereas the distribution of the true allele frequencies is only indirectly specified through a transition model.As a hierarchical specification, it is natural to fit the LEP within a Bayesian framework. Fitting such models is usually done via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). However, we demonstrate that, in the case of LEP models, implementation of MCMC is far from straightforward. The main contribution of this paper is to provide a methodology to implement MCMC for LEP models. We demonstrate our approach in population genetics problems with both simulated and real data sets. The resultant model fitting is computationally intensive and thus, we also discuss parallel implementation of the procedure in special cases.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18836571      PMCID: PMC2557441          DOI: 10.1007/s11222-006-9015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Comput        ISSN: 0960-3174            Impact factor:   2.559


  8 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach.

Authors:  P Beerli; J Felsenstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Exact moment calculations for genetic models with migration, mutation, and drift.

Authors:  Rongwei Fu; Alan E Gelfand; Kent E Holsinger
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Analytic solution of Hubbell's model of local community dynamics.

Authors:  Alan J McKane; David Alonso; Ricard V Solé
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Bayesian approaches for the analysis of population genetic structure: an example from Platanthera leucophaea (Orchidaceae).

Authors:  Kent E Holsinger; Lisa E Wallace
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Bayesian models for the analysis of genetic structure when populations are correlated.

Authors:  Rongwei Fu; Dipak K Dey; Kent E Holsinger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Neutral ecological theory reveals isolation and rapid speciation in a biodiversity hot spot.

Authors:  Andrew M Latimer; John A Silander; Richard M Cowling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Differentiation among populations with migration, mutation, and drift: implications for genetic inference.

Authors:  Seongho Song; Dipak K Dey; Kent E Holsinger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality.

Authors:  P Donnelly; S Tavaré
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The 'prediction imperative' as the basis for self-awareness.

Authors:  Rodolfo R Llinás; Sisir Roy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Estimating population-level coancestry coefficients by an admixture F model.

Authors:  Markku Karhunen; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.