AIMS: Exercise intolerance occurs in both systolic and diastolic heart failure (HF). Exercise oscillatory breathing (EOB) is a powerful predictor of survival in patients with systolic HF. In diastolic HF, EOB prevalence and prognostic impact are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 556 HF patients (405 with systolic HF and 151 with diastolic HF) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Diastolic HF was defined as signs and symptoms of HF, a left ventricular ejection fraction > or =50%, and a Doppler early (E) mitral to early mitral annulus ratio (E') > or =8. CPET responses, EOB prevalence and its ability to predict cardiac-related events were examined. EOB prevalence in systolic and diastolic HF was similar (35 vs. 31%). Compared with the patients without EOB, patients with EOB and either systolic or diastolic HF had a higher New York Heart Association class, lower peak VO(2) and higher E/E' ratio (all P < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that peak VO(2), VE/VCO(2) slope and EOB all were significant predictors of cardiac events in both systolic and diastolic HF. Multivariable analysis revealed that EOB was retained as a prognostic marker in systolic HF and was the strongest predictor of cardiac events in diastolic HF. CONCLUSION: EOB occurrence is similar in diastolic and systolic HF and provides relevant clues for the identification of diastolic HF patients at increased risk of adverse events.
AIMS: Exercise intolerance occurs in both systolic and diastolic heart failure (HF). Exercise oscillatory breathing (EOB) is a powerful predictor of survival in patients with systolic HF. In diastolic HF, EOB prevalence and prognostic impact are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 556 HF patients (405 with systolic HF and 151 with diastolic HF) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Diastolic HF was defined as signs and symptoms of HF, a left ventricular ejection fraction > or =50%, and a Doppler early (E) mitral to early mitral annulus ratio (E') > or =8. CPET responses, EOB prevalence and its ability to predict cardiac-related events were examined. EOB prevalence in systolic and diastolic HF was similar (35 vs. 31%). Compared with the patients without EOB, patients with EOB and either systolic or diastolic HF had a higher New York Heart Association class, lower peak VO(2) and higher E/E' ratio (all P < 0.01). Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that peak VO(2), VE/VCO(2) slope and EOB all were significant predictors of cardiac events in both systolic and diastolic HF. Multivariable analysis revealed that EOB was retained as a prognostic marker in systolic HF and was the strongest predictor of cardiac events in diastolic HF. CONCLUSION: EOB occurrence is similar in diastolic and systolic HF and provides relevant clues for the identification of diastolic HFpatients at increased risk of adverse events.
Authors: Cole S Bailey; Luke T Wooster; Mary Buswell; Sarvagna Patel; Paul P Pappagianopoulos; Kristian Bakken; Casey White; Melissa Tanguay; Jasmine B Blodgett; Aaron L Baggish; Rajeev Malhotra; Gregory D Lewis Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Ross Arena; Jonathan Myers; Joshua Abella; Sherry Pinkstaff; Peter Brubaker; Dalane W Kitzman; Mary Ann Peberdy; Daniel Bensimhon; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Margaret M Redfield; Barry A Borlaug; Greg D Lewis; Selma F Mohammed; Marc J Semigran; Martin M Lewinter; Anita Deswal; Adrian F Hernandez; Kerry L Lee; Eugene Braunwald Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-09-01 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Ali Shafiq; Clinton A Brawner; Heather A Aldred; Barry Lewis; Celeste T Williams; Christina Tita; John R Schairer; Jonathan K Ehrman; Mauricio Velez; Yelena Selektor; David E Lanfear; Steven J Keteyian Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jessica M Scott; Mark J Haykowsky; Joel Eggebeen; Timothy M Morgan; Peter H Brubaker; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 2.778