Literature DB >> 18835958

Adult metabolic syndrome and impaired glucose tolerance are associated with different patterns of BMI gain during infancy: Data from the New Delhi Birth Cohort.

Caroline H D Fall1, Harshpal Singh Sachdev, Clive Osmond, Ramakrishnan Lakshmy, Sushant Dey Biswas, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, Siddharth Ramji, K Srinath Reddy, David J P Barker, Santosh K Bhargava.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe patterns of infant, childhood, and adolescent BMI and weight associated with adult metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured waist circumference, blood pressure, glucose, insulin and lipid concentrations, and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition) in 1,492 men and women aged 26-32 years in Delhi, India, whose weight and height were recorded every 6 months throughout infancy (0-2 years), childhood (2-11 years), and adolescence (11 years-adult).
RESULTS: Men and women with metabolic syndrome (29% overall), any of its component features, or higher (greater than upper quartile) insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment) had more rapid BMI or weight gain than the rest of the cohort throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence. Glucose intolerance (impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes) was, like metabolic syndrome, associated with rapid BMI gain in childhood and adolescence but with lower BMI in infancy.
CONCLUSIONS: In this Indian population, patterns of infant BMI and weight gain differed for individuals who developed metabolic syndrome (rapid gain) compared with those who developed glucose intolerance (low infant BMI). Rapid BMI gain during childhood and adolescence was a risk factor for both disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18835958      PMCID: PMC2584194          DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   17.152


Approximately 10% of urban Indian men and women aged 40–49 years have type 2 diabetes, and a rising prevalence is predicted to produce 80 million diabetic patients in India by 2030 (1–3). Cardiovascular disease is also rising (4). Similar trends, thought to reflect increasing obesity, are occurring in other developing countries undergoing economic transition, and interventions to prevent disease are urgently needed. Research in high-income countries has shown that factors linked to weight gain in early life contribute to the risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Low birth weight (5,6) and accelerated gain in BMI during childhood and adolescence predict increased risk (7,8). The optimal pattern of infant weight gain (the first 1–2 postnatal years) is unclear; studies of adults suggest that low infant weight gain is a risk factor for later disease (7–9), whereas studies of children suggest the opposite (10,11). There are few data from developing countries. In the New Delhi birth cohort (12,13), children were measured at birth and every 6 months throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence. We reported earlier that low BMI in infancy and rapid childhood BMI gain were associated with an increased risk of adult diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (12). We have now examined other cardiovascular risk factors and the cluster of risk factors known as the metabolic syndrome.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

During 1969–1972, married women living in a 12-km2 area of Delhi (n = 20,755) were followed up (12,13). There were 9,169 pregnancies and 8,181 live births. Trained personnel recorded the babies’ weight and length within 72 h of birth and every 6 months until age 14–21 years. Gaps in funding interrupted measurements in 1972–1973 and 1980–1982. At recruitment, 60% of families had incomes of >50 rupees/month (national average 28 rupees/month) and 15% of parents were illiterate (national average 66%). Nevertheless, 43% of families lived in one room. Hindus were the majority religious group (84%), followed by Sikhs (12%), Christians (2%), Muslims (1%), and Jains (1%).

Current study

In 1998–2002 we retraced 2,584 (32%) of the cohort and 1,583 agreed to participate. Data on schooling, occupation, household possessions, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, physical activity, and family history were obtained by questionnaire (12,13). Weight and height were measured using standardized techniques. Waist circumference was measured using fiberglass tape, in expiration, midway between the lower lateral costal margin and the iliac crest, with the subject standing. Blood pressure was recorded using an automated device (Omron 711) with the subject seated, after 5 minutes of rest (mean of two readings). Plasma glucose concentrations were measured fasting and 120-min after a 75-g glucose load. Glucose and fasting cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were analyzed by enzymatic methods using Randox kits on a Beckman AutoAnalyzer, and HDL cholesterol was measured using the same method after phosphotungstate precipitation. IGT and diabetes were defined using World Health Organization criteria (14). Metabolic syndrome was defined using National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (15,16). Insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment [HOMA]) was estimated (17). The study was approved by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences research ethics committee, and informed verbal consent was obtained.

Statistical analyses

Data from the whole original cohort was used to derive individual SD scores for BMI and weight at 6 months and birthdays from 1 to 21 years (12). Participants had a mean ± SD of 23 ± 5.5 observations. Interpolated values were used if measurements were made within 6 months (up to 1 year), 1 year (aged 2 years), 1.5 years (aged 3 years), and 2 years (all older ages). Back-transformation provided estimates of measurements at these ages. To measure changes in measurements in early life (e.g., from 2 to 11 years), we regressed SD scores at the end of the interval (11 years) on SD scores at the beginning (2 years) and at all preceding time points (birth, 6 months, and 1 year) and expressed the residuals as SD scores. This method produces uncorrelated variables describing change between specific ages (conditional SD scores). Quadratic terms were included when relationships between measurements at different ages were nonlinear. Associations between size in early life and adult outcomes were examined using regression. Outcomes with skewed distributions (HDL cholesterol and insulin resistance) were log-transformed.

RESULTS

Of the 1,526 subjects attending the clinic, glucose tolerance category was definable for 1,442 and metabolic syndrome for 1,492. Compared with the remainder of the original cohort, more participants were male (58 vs. 52%, P < 0.001), mean birth weight was heavier (2,851 vs. 2,818 g, P = 0.046), and maternal literacy was 6% higher. BMI SD scores differed by −0.10 to 0.06 (mean −0.04) between birth and 21 years and were statistically significant at 11 and 12 years. The children were short, light, and thin according to an international reference (18), but as adults almost half were overweight or obese (Table 1).
Table 1

Body measurements at birth, 2, 11, and 26–32 years and adult risk factors and components of the metabolic syndrome

MennWomenn
n886640
Birth
    Length (SD score)*−0.44 ± 0.80779−0.45 ± 0.81558
    Weight (SD score)*−1.06 ± 0.71803−1.17 ± 0.72561
At 2 years
    Height (SD score)*−1.54 ± 1.03840−1.55 ± 1.04609
    Weight (SD score)*−2.01 ± 1.19834−2.27 ± 1.43609
    BMI (SD score)*−0.78 ± 1.10833−0.85 ± 0.98604
At 11 years
    Height (SD score)*−1.11 ± 0.84831−1.37 ± 1.04607
    Weight (SD score)*−1.56 ± 1.01834−1.87 ± 1.19608
    BMI (SD score)*−1.23 ± 1.03830−1.31 ± 1.04606
Adult
    Age (years)29.2 ± 1.388629.2 ± 1.4640
    Height (cm)169.7 ± 6.4886154.9 ± 5.7638
    BMI (kg/m2)24.9 ± 4.388624.6 ± 5.1638
    Waist circumference (cm)90.2 ± 12.188679.6 ± 12.4640
    Overweight (BMI ≥25) (%)47.488645.5638
    Obese (BMI ≥30) (%)9.588613.0638
    Any alcohol intake (%)56.28861.4640
    Ex-smokers (%)5.18860.2640
    Current smokers (%)29.88860.2640
    Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)118.4 ± 11.4880106.6 ± 11.0631
    Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)77.9 ± 10.388073.4 ± 9.2631
Fasting
    Glucose (mmol/l)5.37 ± 1.218695.28 ± 1.17623
    Insulin (pmol/l)34.4 ± 2.6286828.8 ± 2.64623
    Insulin resistance (HOMA)1.37 ± 2.738681.13 ± 2.75623
    Total cholesterol (mmol/l)5.16 ± 1.148694.75 ± 0.94623
    HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)1.12 ± 1.308691.24 ± 1.29621
    Triglycerides (mmol/l)1.57 ± 1.698681.05 ± 1.51623
    2-h glucose (mmol/l)5.93 ± 1.348486.12 ± 1.28591
Components of the metabolic syndrome
    High waist circumference (%): ≥90 cm (men) ≥80 cm (women)51.588645.5640
    Low HDL cholesterol (%) <1.0 mmol/l (men) <1.3 mmol/l (women)34.286955.6621
    High triglycerides (%) ≥1.7 mmol/l41.286810.6623
    High blood pressure (%): systolic ≥130 or diastolic ≥85 mmHg or receiving treatment for hypertension27.688012.3632
    High fasting glucose (%) ≥5.6 mmol/l41.386936.6623
    Metabolic syndrome (NCEP-ATPIII) (%)35.686920.2623
    Diabetes (%)4.88493.7593
    IGT (%)11.284910.3593

Data are arithmetic means ± SD or % unless otherwise indicated.

SD scores are based on National Centre for Health Statistics data (18).

Geometric means ± SD. ATPIII, Adult Treatment Panel III; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program.

BMI (Table 2) and weight at birth and 2 years were positively related to adult waist circumference and inversely related to 120-min glucose concentrations. Eleven-year BMI was positively related to all outcomes except HDL cholesterol and glucose, and adult BMI was positively related to all outcomes except HDL cholesterol, to which it was inversely related. After adjustment for adult BMI, the associations with earlier BMI reversed, becoming significantly inverse for many outcomes. The associations were little changed after further adjustment for adult lifestyle factors (data not shown).
Table 2

Mean waist circumference, HDL cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose concentration, prevalence of metabolic syndrome and IGT/DM, insulin resistance, and total cholesterol concentrations according to BMI at birth, age 2 years, age 11 years, and adulthood

n
Waist circumference (cm)HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)*Triglycerides (mmol/l)*Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)Fasting glucose (mmol/l)*120-min glucose (mmol/l)*Metabolic syndrome (NCEP-ATP III) (%)IGT/diabetes (%)Insulin resistance (HOMA)*Cholesterol (mmol/l)
MinMax
Fifths of BMI at birth (kg/m2)
    Low25326684.01.181.35113.85.336.1630.215.41.275.04
25526885.81.171.33113.75.476.0629.716.91.354.99
25026886.41.181.34113.95.345.9228.813.21.334.98
25526886.51.161.33113.85.295.9731.612.91.225.05
    High25126786.51.161.31112.65.265.8924.715.51.194.93
    P10.02 (+)0.90.40.50.060.03 (−)0.10.40.30.7
    P20.10.80.090.05 (−)0.04 (−)0.009 (−)0.002 (−)0.20.004 (−)0.3
Fifths of BMI at 2 years (kg/m2)
    Low26728682.51.181.31112.55.366.3129.319.91.224.99
27328883.51.171.23114.15.386.1524.917.21.174.84
27328885.81.191.42112.85.335.9329.212.51.255.09
27128886.61.161.38114.45.205.7629.412.21.265.09
    High27528790.11.151.29113.75.395.9032.713.51.364.88
    P1<0.001 (+)0.30.60.10.6<0.001 (−)0.10.060.10.8
    P20.40.90.02 (−)0.05 (−)0.2<0.001 (−)0.01 (−)0.002 (−)0.002 (−)0.02 (−)
Fifths of BMI at 11 years (kg/m2)
    Low26728778.21.201.25111.85.336.0918.215.71.064.91
27228782.41.181.31112.65.355.9824.812.51.184.94
27128884.71.191.31113.55.295.9829.116.21.185.03
26828788.71.161.30113.65.365.9533.013.11.344.91
    High27628794.81.151.44116.35.366.0440.518.11.625.13
    P1<0.001 (+)0.80.002 (+)<0.001 (+)0.30.8<0.001 (+)0.09<0.001 (+)0.05 (+)
    P2<0.001 (−)0.02 (+)<0.001 (−)<0.001 (−)0.3<0.001 (−)<0.001 (−)0.2<0.001 (−)<0.001 (−)
Fifths of adult BMI (kg/m2)
    Low27830470.61.221.02107.95.255.664.59.40.664.53
28830580.31.181.28112.15.285.8912.711.80.944.93
29730685.81.161.38114.05.286.0326.412.51.315.12
29230591.31.171.43115.55.386.0843.718.81.635.12
    High286304100.91.111.57118.15.476.3857.923.12.365.23
    P1<0.001 (+)<0.001 (−)<0.001 (+)<0.001 (+)0.001 (+)<0.001 (+)<0.001 (+)<0.001 (+)<0.001 (+)<0.001 (+)

All available data was used; minimum (Min) and maximum (Max) numbers of subjects in each row are provided. Fifths of BMI were sex-specific. All values in the table are adjusted for age and sex, except for the binary outcome variables.

Denotes geometric mean. P values are derived from regression analysis, using all variables except binary outcomes as continuous. P1 was adjusted for age and sex. P2 was adjusted for age, sex, and adult BMI. Alongside statistically significant P values (P ≤ 0.05) (+) denotes a positive association and (−) denotes an inverse association. ATPIII, Adult Treatment Panel III; NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program.

Subjects with high adult waist circumference, triglycerides, blood pressure, and insulin resistance and those with metabolic syndrome had a higher mean BMI than the cohort mean at all ages from birth (Figs. 1 and 2). The pattern for metabolic syndrome (Fig. 2) matched that for overweight/obesity (Fig. 2) but differed from that for IGT/diabetes (Fig. 2), which was associated with high BMI during childhood and adolescence but a low BMI from 1 to 4 years.
Figure 1

Mean ± SD scores for BMI measured at earlier ages in subjects with components of the metabolic syndrome (A–E) and insulin resistance (HOMA) (F) above the upper quartile. High waist circumference (A), low HDL cholesterol concentration (B), high triglyceride concentration (C), high blood pressure (D), high fasting glucose concentration (E), and insulin resistance (HOMA) (F).The rest of the cohort is represented by the zero line in all graphs.

Figure 2

Mean ± SD scores for BMI and weight measured at earlier ages for subjects who developed (A and B) metabolic syndrome, (C and D) overweight or obesity (BMI >25 kg/m2), and (E and F) IGT or diabetes. The rest of the cohort is represented by the zero line in all graphs.

Conditional regression analyses showed (Table 3) that greater BMI gain from birth to 2 years was associated with higher adult waist circumference and systolic blood pressure and lower 120-min glucose concentration. Weight gain in infancy was more strongly related to adult risk factors than BMI gain (Table 4, Fig. 2) and showed additional positive associations with triglycerides, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome. Greater BMI/weight gain from 2 to 11 years was associated with higher waist circumference, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and insulin resistance and a higher risk of IGT/diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Greater BMI/weight gain between 11 years and adulthood was associated with an increase in all risk factors (lower HDL cholesterol).
Table 3

Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses using conditional BMI SD scores in earlier life to predict adult outcomes

Risk factorsBMI at birth (SD score)
BMI change*
Birth–2 years (SD)
2–11 years (SD)
11–adult (SD)
B95% CIPB95% CIPB95% CIPB95% CIP
Waist circumference (SD)0.070.05–0.09<0.0010.190.17–0.22<0.0010.430.41–0.46<0.0010.740.72–0.77<0.001
HDL cholesterol (SD)0.00−0.05–0.051.0−0.01−0.07–0.050.7−0.01−0.07–0.050.7−0.14−0.20–−0.08<0.001
Triglycerides (SD)−0.01−0.06–0.030.5−0.00−0.06–0.061.00.060.01–0.120.030.290.23–0.35<0.001
Systolic blood pressure (SD)−0.03−0.07–0.020.30.060.01–0.120.020.110.06–0.17<0.0010.300.24–0.35<0.001
Fasting glucose (SD)−0.03−0.08–0.020.2−0.02−0.08–0.030.40.03−0.03–0.090.30.080.02–0.140.006
120-min glucose (SD)−0.05−0.09–0.000.05−0.08−0.14–−0.020.010.04−0.02–0.090.20.190.13–0.25<0.001
Insulin resistance (HOMA) (SD)−0.01−0.05–0.040.80.04−0.02–0.090.20.150.09–0.20<0.0010.450.40–0.51<0.001
Cholesterol (SD)−0.01−0.06–0.040.7−0.03−0.09–0.020.20.01−0.04–0.070.60.190.13–0.25<0.001

BMI changes are calculated as conditional measures; the standardized residuals of a BMI SD score value regressed on earlier SD score values. The continuous outcome variables were normalized so that B (regression coefficient) values for the associations with SD scores at birth and changes in early life indicate the SD change in the outcome per SD change in the predictor. All analyses are adjusted for age, sex, and lifestyle factors: alcohol consumption (four levels from none to heavy), physical activity (continuous measure estimated from reported activity levels, transformed, and expressed as a sex-specific SD score), tobacco use (categorized into never, ex-user, and current user), socioeconomic status in childhood based on father's occupation (ranging from 1 [low class] to 6 [high class]), socioeconomic status in adult life derived from education level, household possessions and occupation (ranging from 1 [low class] to 17 [high class]), and family history of any of high blood pressure, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, or diabetes in a first-degree relative.

Table 4

Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses using conditional weight SD scores in earlier life to predict adult outcomes

Risk factorsWeight at birth (SD score)
Weight change*
Birth–2 years (SD)
2–11 years (SD)
11–adult (SD)
B95% CIPB95% CIPB95% CIPB95% CIP
Waist circumference (SD)0.150.13–0.17<0.0010.300.27–0.32<0.0010.410.38–0.43<0.0010.740.72–0.76<0.001
HDL cholesterol (SD)−0.03−0.09–0.020.3−0.03−0.09–0.030.3−0.03−0.09–0.030.3−0.14−0.20–−0.08<0.001
Triglycerides (SD)−0.03−0.09–0.020.30.090.03–0.150.0040.070.01–0.120.020.280.22–0.34<0.001
Systolic blood pressure (SD)−0.02−0.07–0.040.50.110.05–0.17<0.0010.110.06–0.17<0.0010.300.24–0.35<0.001
Fasting glucose (SD)−0.02−0.08–0.040.50.04−0.02–0.100.20.04−0.01–0.100.10.070.01–0.130.01
120-min glucose (SD)−0.04−0.10–0.020.2−0.04−0.10–0.020.20.06−0.00–0.120.060.170.11–0.23<0.001
Insulin resistance (HOMA) (SD)0.00−0.05–0.060.90.080.02–0.130.0050.150.10–0.20<0.0010.440.39–0.49<0.001
Cholesterol (SD)−0.04−0.10–0.020.20.00−0.06–0.061.00.01−0.05–0.070.70.160.10–0.22<0.001

Weight changes are calculated as conditional measures; the standardized residuals of a weight SD score value regressed on earlier SD score values. The continuous outcome variables were normalized so that B (regression coefficient) values for the associations with SD scores at birth and changes in early life indicate the SD change in the outcome per SD change in the predictor. All analyses are adjusted for age, sex, and lifestyle factors: alcohol consumption (four levels from none to heavy), physical activity (continuous measure estimated from reported activity levels, transformed, and expressed as a sex-specific SD score), tobacco use (categorized into never, ex-user, and current user), socioeconomic status in childhood based on father's occupation (ranging from 1 [low class] to 6 [high class]), socioeconomic status in adult life derived from education level, household possessions and occupation (ranging from 1 [low class] to 17 [high class]), and family history of any of high blood pressure, angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, or diabetes in a first-degree relative.

The inverse association between infant BMI gain and adult IGT/diabetes was stronger in subjects with lower birth weight (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58–0.95] for subjects weighing <2,850 g [median] compared with 1.05 [0.81–1.36] for subjects weighing ≥2,850 g, Pinteraction = 0.01). There were no significant interactions at other ages or for other outcomes. Mean ± SD age at adiposity rebound (lowest recorded childhood BMI) was 6.6 ± 1.7 years. Earlier rebound was associated with increased adult metabolic syndrome (P = 0.07) and IGT/diabetes (P = 0.04) and higher waist circumference (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.052), triglyceride concentration (P = 0.054), and 120-min glucose concentration (P = 0.01). These associations became nonsignificant after adjustment for adult BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

The Delhi cohort represents an affluent, well-educated section of Indian society that has undergone considerable “transition.” As children they were thin, but as young adults almost half were overweight and 29% had metabolic syndrome. Higher levels of all risk factors except IGT/diabetes were associated with BMI or weight above the average for the cohort as a whole (Figs. 1 and 2) and more rapid BMI or weight gain than the cohort average (Tables 3 and 4) from birth onward. Strengths of the study were that it was population-based and children were measured by trained personnel, with exceptionally frequent follow-up throughout childhood. As with other birth cohorts, there was considerable loss to follow-up and participants are likely to be unrepresentative of the original sample. However, differences in their childhood sizes were small, and in a within-sample analysis, loss to follow-up would introduce bias only if associations between early BMI/weight and later disease differed between those studied and not studied, which seems unlikely given that inclusion was based only on subjects’ availability.

Birth

Studies in high-income countries have shown increased metabolic syndrome in adults of lower birth weight (19). In Delhi, after adjustment for adult BMI, there were inverse associations with BMI at birth for metabolic syndrome and its components (Table 2), but these resulted from positive associations with childhood BMI gain, not from lower BMI at birth (Table 3). The absence of associations between metabolic syndrome and small size at birth in this population may be due to their young age, low mean birth weight, or different newborn body composition (20).

Infancy

Consistent with studies of adults in high-income countries (8,9), greater infant BMI/weight gain was associated with a lower risk of diabetes, especially in lower-birth-weight infants. However, it was associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome and its components, which is consistent with recent studies showing higher BMI, blood pressure, and insulin concentrations in children who had greater infant weight gain (10,11,21). Understanding these apparently paradoxical findings is important. Effects may differ among populations according to body composition at birth and fat and lean mass accrual during infancy and may vary for different outcomes according to critical periods of development for different tissues. In developing countries, greater infant weight gain is beneficial for survival, growth, and neurocognitive development (22). However, it may become disadvantageous as obesity-related adult chronic diseases emerge (23). The balance of benefits and risks will become clearer as the cohort ages enough to assess cardiovascular disease and mortality. In an intervention study with relevant adult outcomes, protein-energy supplementation in infancy produced no increase in adult cardiovascular risk factors (24).

Childhood and adolescence

A clear message from our study, consistent with studies in high-income countries, is that rapid BMI gain in childhood and adolescence and earlier adiposity rebound are associated with adult metabolic syndrome and IGT/diabetes. This result probably reflects the known correlation between childhood and adult BMI. Thus, even in underweight children in developing countries, increasing BMI SD scores (“becoming obese relative to oneself”) is a risk factor for later disease. Reinforced by evidence that risk factors in Indian children are already high (25), our study supports efforts to prevent childhood obesity. It also suggests that interventions to control adiposity should be targeted not only to obese children, but also to “normal” weight children with rising BMI SD scores.
  23 in total

1.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III).

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study.

Authors:  C S Yajnik; C H D Fall; K J Coyaji; S S Hirve; S Rao; D J P Barker; C Joglekar; S Kellingray
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2003-02

3.  Metabolic syndrome scientific statement by the American Heart Association and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.311

4.  Is birth weight a risk factor for ischemic heart disease in later life?

Authors:  Rachel Huxley; Christopher G Owen; Peter H Whincup; Derek G Cook; Janet Rich-Edwards; George Davey Smith; Rory Collins
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Infant weight gain and childhood overweight status in a multicenter, cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Stettler; Babette S Zemel; Shiriki Kumanyika; Virginia A Stallings
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Early adiposity rebound in childhood and risk of Type 2 diabetes in adult life.

Authors:  J G Eriksson; T Forsén; J Tuomilehto; C Osmond; D J P Barker
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Cardiovascular risk factor prevalence among men in a large industry of northern India.

Authors:  D Prabhakaran; Pankaj Shah; Vivek Chaturvedi; Lakshmy Ramakrishnan; Ajay Manhapra; K Srinath Reddy
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.537

8.  Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64.

Authors:  C N Hales; D J Barker; P M Clark; L J Cox; C Fall; C Osmond; P D Winter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-26

Review 9.  Is birth weight related to later glucose and insulin metabolism?--A systematic review.

Authors:  C A Newsome; A W Shiell; C H D Fall; D I W Phillips; R Shier; C M Law
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 10.  Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Linda Adair; Caroline Fall; Pedro C Hallal; Reynaldo Martorell; Linda Richter; Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  48 in total

1.  Incidence of cardiovascular risk factors in an Indian urban cohort results from the New Delhi birth cohort.

Authors:  Mark D Huffman; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Clive Osmond; Caroline H D Fall; Nikhil Tandon; Ramakrishnan Lakshmy; Siddharth Ramji; Anita Khalil; Tarun Gera; Poornima Prabhakaran; S K Dey Biswas; K Srinath Reddy; Santosh K Bhargava; Harshpal S Sachdev
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Cardiovascular disease risk factors: a childhood perspective.

Authors:  Pradeep A Praveen; Ambuj Roy; Dorairaj Prabhakaran
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Body composition of term healthy Indian newborns.

Authors:  V Jain; A V Kurpad; B Kumar; S Devi; V Sreenivas; V K Paul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Is the "South Asian Phenotype" Unique to South Asians?: Comparing Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in the CARRS and NHANES Studies.

Authors:  Shivani A Patel; Roopa Shivashankar; Mohammed K Ali; R M Anjana; M Deepa; Deksha Kapoor; Dimple Kondal; Garima Rautela; V Mohan; K M Venkat Narayan; M Masood Kadir; Zafar Fatmi; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Nikhil Tandon
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2016-03

5.  The contribution of feeding mode to obesogenic growth trajectories in American Samoan infants.

Authors:  N L Hawley; W Johnson; O Nu'usolia; S T McGarvey
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Recent advances in understanding the long-term sequelae of childhood infectious diarrhea.

Authors:  Rebecca J Scharf; Mark D Deboer; Richard L Guerrant
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Fetal and infant growth patterns and kidney function at school age.

Authors:  Hanneke Bakker; Romy Gaillard; Oscar H Franco; Albert Hofman; Albert J van der Heijden; Eric A P Steegers; H Rob Taal; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  Genetic markers of adult obesity risk are associated with greater early infancy weight gain and growth.

Authors:  Cathy E Elks; Ruth J F Loos; Stephen J Sharp; Claudia Langenberg; Susan M Ring; Nicholas J Timpson; Andrew R Ness; George Davey Smith; David B Dunger; Nicholas J Wareham; Ken K Ong
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Type 2 diabetes gene TCF7L2 polymorphism is not associated with fetal and postnatal growth in two birth cohort studies.

Authors:  Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; Sandra W K de Kort; Cornelia M van Duijn; Andre G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Anita C S Hokken-Koelega; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  Estimated birth weight and adult cardiovascular risk factors in a developing southern Chinese population: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  C M Schooling; C Q Jiang; T H Lam; B J Cowling; S L Au Yeung; W S Zhang; K K Cheng; G M Leung
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.