BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity and overweight is rapidly increasing in industrialized countries, with long-term health and social consequences. There is also a strong social patterning of obesity and overweight, with a higher prevalence among women, racial/ethnic minorities and those from a lower socio-economic position (SEP). Most of the existing work in this area, however, is based on cross-sectional data or single cohort studies. No national studies to date have examined how social disparities in obesity and overweight differ by age and historical period using longitudinal data with repeated measures. METHODS: We used panel data from the nationally representative Monitoring the Future Study (1986-2004) to examine social disparities in trajectories of body mass index (BMI) over adulthood (age 18-45). Self-reported height and weight were collected in this annual US survey of high-school seniors, followed biennially since 1976. Using growth curve models, we analysed BMI trajectories over adulthood by gender, race/ethnicity and lifetime SEP (measured by parents' education and respondent's education). RESULTS: BMI trajectories exhibit a curvilinear rate of change from age 18 to 45, but there was a strong period effect, such that weight gain was more rapid for more recent cohorts. As a result, successive cohorts become overweight (BMI>25) at increasingly earlier points in the life course. BMI scores were also consistently higher for women, racial/ethnic minority groups and those from a lower SEP. However, BMI scores for socially advantaged groups in recent cohorts were actually higher than those for their socially disadvantaged counterparts who were born 10 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the importance of social status and socio-economic resources for maintaining optimal weight. Yet, even those in advantaged social positions have experienced an increase in BMI in recent years.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity and overweight is rapidly increasing in industrialized countries, with long-term health and social consequences. There is also a strong social patterning of obesity and overweight, with a higher prevalence among women, racial/ethnic minorities and those from a lower socio-economic position (SEP). Most of the existing work in this area, however, is based on cross-sectional data or single cohort studies. No national studies to date have examined how social disparities in obesity and overweight differ by age and historical period using longitudinal data with repeated measures. METHODS: We used panel data from the nationally representative Monitoring the Future Study (1986-2004) to examine social disparities in trajectories of body mass index (BMI) over adulthood (age 18-45). Self-reported height and weight were collected in this annual US survey of high-school seniors, followed biennially since 1976. Using growth curve models, we analysed BMI trajectories over adulthood by gender, race/ethnicity and lifetime SEP (measured by parents' education and respondent's education). RESULTS: BMI trajectories exhibit a curvilinear rate of change from age 18 to 45, but there was a strong period effect, such that weight gain was more rapid for more recent cohorts. As a result, successive cohorts become overweight (BMI>25) at increasingly earlier points in the life course. BMI scores were also consistently higher for women, racial/ethnic minority groups and those from a lower SEP. However, BMI scores for socially advantaged groups in recent cohorts were actually higher than those for their socially disadvantaged counterparts who were born 10 years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the importance of social status and socio-economic resources for maintaining optimal weight. Yet, even those in advantaged social positions have experienced an increase in BMI in recent years.
Authors: Elizabeth A Baker; Cheryl Kelly; Ellen Barnidge; Jennifer Strayhorn; Mario Schootman; Jim Struthers; Deidre Griffith Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sherman A James; Angela Fowler-Brown; Trevillore E Raghunathan; John Van Hoewyk Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Allison A Hedley; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hiroshi Murayama; Jersey Liang; Joan M Bennett; Benjamin A Shaw; Anda Botoseneanu; Erika Kobayashi; Taro Fukaya; Shoji Shinkai Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Judith A Groner; Hong Huang; Mandar S Joshi; Nicholas Eastman; Lisa Nicholson; John Anthony Bauer Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Kirsten K Davison; Selma Gicevic; Alyssa Aftosmes-Tobio; Claudia Ganter; Christine L Simon; Sami Newlan; Jennifer A Manganello Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joya N Hampton; Hanan D Trotman; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Ming T Tsuang; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Scott W Woods; Elaine F Walker Journal: Stress Health Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Barbara S Taylor; Yuanyuan Liang; L Sergio Garduño; Elizabeth A Walter; Margit B Gerardi; Gregory M Anstead; Delia Bullock; Barbara J Turner Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Paul L Kocken; Meinou H C Theunissen; Yvonne Schönbeck; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Symone B Detmar Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2013-02-07