PURPOSE: Chemotherapeutic agents are known to produce persistent cognitive deficits in cancer patients. However, little progress has been made in developing animal models to explore underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions. We report an electrophysiological model of chemotherapy-induced cognitive deficits using a sensory gating paradigm, to correspond with performance in two behavioral tasks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Mice received four weekly injections of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Whole-brain event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded throughout using a paired-click paradigm. Mice underwent contextual fear conditioning (CFC) and novel-object recognition testing (NOR). RESULTS: Chemotherapy-treated animals showed significantly impaired gating 5 weeks after drug treatments began, as measured by the ratio of the first positive peak in the ERP (P1) minus the first negative peak (N1) between first and second auditory stimuli. There was no effect of drug on the amplitude of P1-N1 or latency of P1. The drug-treated animals also showed significantly increased freezing during fear conditioning and increased exploration without memory impairment during novel object recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy causes decreased ability to gate incoming auditory stimuli, which may underlie associated cognitive impairments. These gating deficits were associated with a hyperactive response to fear conditioning and reduced adaptation to novel objects, suggesting an additional component of emotional dysregulation. However, amplitudes and latencies of ERP components were unaffected, as was NOR performance, highlighting the subtle nature of these deficits.
PURPOSE: Chemotherapeutic agents are known to produce persistent cognitive deficits in cancerpatients. However, little progress has been made in developing animal models to explore underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions. We report an electrophysiological model of chemotherapy-induced cognitive deficits using a sensory gating paradigm, to correspond with performance in two behavioral tasks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Mice received four weekly injections of methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Whole-brain event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded throughout using a paired-click paradigm. Mice underwent contextual fear conditioning (CFC) and novel-object recognition testing (NOR). RESULTS: Chemotherapy-treated animals showed significantly impaired gating 5 weeks after drug treatments began, as measured by the ratio of the first positive peak in the ERP (P1) minus the first negative peak (N1) between first and second auditory stimuli. There was no effect of drug on the amplitude of P1-N1 or latency of P1. The drug-treated animals also showed significantly increased freezing during fear conditioning and increased exploration without memory impairment during novel object recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy causes decreased ability to gate incoming auditory stimuli, which may underlie associated cognitive impairments. These gating deficits were associated with a hyperactive response to fear conditioning and reduced adaptation to novel objects, suggesting an additional component of emotional dysregulation. However, amplitudes and latencies of ERP components were unaffected, as was NOR performance, highlighting the subtle nature of these deficits.
Authors: K E Stevens; R Freedman; A C Collins; M Hall; S Leonard; M J Marks; G M Rose Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: M J Gandal; R L Anderson; E N Billingslea; G C Carlson; T P L Roberts; S J Siegel Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Valerie M Tatard-Leitman; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jimmy Suh; John A Saunders; Eddie N Billingslea; Susumu Morita; Rachel White; Robert E Featherstone; Rabindranath Ray; Pavel I Ortinski; Anamika Banerjee; Michael J Gandal; Robert Lin; Anamaria Alexandrescu; Yuling Liang; Raquel E Gur; Karin E Borgmann-Winter; Gregory C Carlson; Chang-Gyu Hahn; Steven J Siegel Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-07-18 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Alexandra M Gaynor; Denise Pergolizzi; Yesne Alici; Elizabeth Ryan; Katrazyna McNeal; Tim A Ahles; James C Root Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Russell G Port; Jeffrey I Berman; Song Liu; Robert E Featherstone; Timothy P L Roberts; Steven J Siegel Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2019-03-15
Authors: Eddie N Billingslea; Valerie M Tatard-Leitman; Jaynie Anguiano; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jimmy Suh; John A Saunders; Susumu Morita; Robert E Featherstone; Pavel I Ortinski; Michael J Gandal; Robert Lin; Yuling Liang; Raquel E Gur; Gregory C Carlson; Chang-Gyu Hahn; Steven J Siegel Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: John A Saunders; Valerie M Tatard-Leitman; Jimmy Suh; Eddie N Billingslea; Timothy P Roberts; Steven J Siegel Journal: Autism Res Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 5.216