Literature DB >> 18835285

Danger is worse when it moves: neural and behavioral indices of enhanced attentional capture by dynamic threatening stimuli.

Luis Carretié1, José A Hinojosa, Sara López-Martín, Jacobo Albert, Manuel Tapia, Miguel A Pozo.   

Abstract

Both dynamic non-emotional stimuli (moving dots or digits) and danger-related static stimuli have previously shown to capture attention. This study explored whether the combination of the two factors (i.e., threatening moving stimuli), frequent in natural situations, enhances attentional capture. To this end, static and moving distractors containing emotionally negative and non-negative information were presented to 30 volunteers while they were engaged in a digit categorization task. Behavioral responses and event-related potentials (ERPs) were analyzed. Behavioral and electrophysiological data were convergent: moving negative distractors produced the longest reaction times in the digit categorization task, and elicited the highest amplitudes in the P1 component of the ERPs (peaking at 112ms), an electrophysiological signal of attentional capture. These results suggest that motion provides additional salience to threatening stimuli that facilitates attentional capture.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18835285     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Exogenous attention to facial vs non-facial emotional visual stimuli.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Dominique Kessel; Alejandra Carboni; Sara López-Martín; Jacobo Albert; Manuel Tapia; Francisco Mercado; Almudena Capilla; José A Hinojosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Exogenous Attention to Emotional Stimuli Presenting Realistic (3D) Looming Motion.

Authors:  Uxía Fernández-Folgueiras; María Hernández-Lorca; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Fátima Álvarez; Tamara Giménez-Fernández; Luis Carretié
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 4.275

3.  In exogenous attention, time is the clue: Brain and heart interactions to survive threatening stimuli.

Authors:  Elisabeth Ruiz-Padial; Francisco Mercado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Neural correlates of an early attentional capture by positive distractor words.

Authors:  José A Hinojosa; Francisco Mercado; Jacobo Albert; Paloma Barjola; Irene Peláez; Cristina Villalba-García; Luis Carretié
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-26

Review 5.  Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Luis Carretié
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Approaching threat modulates visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Alyanne M de Haan; Miranda Smit; Stefan Van der Stigchel; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of affective state on exogenous attention to emotional distractors: behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Alejandra Carboni; Dominique Kessel; Almudena Capilla; Luis Carretié
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Peripersonal Space and Bodily Self-Consciousness: Implications for Psychological Trauma-Related Disorders.

Authors:  Daniela Rabellino; Paul A Frewen; Margaret C McKinnon; Ruth A Lanius
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Encouraging expressions affect the brain and alter visual attention.

Authors:  Manuel Martín-Loeches; Alejandra Sel; Pilar Casado; Laura Jiménez; Luis Castellanos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Retinotopy of emotion: Perception of negatively valenced stimuli presented at different spatial locations as revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Constantino Méndez-Bértolo; Cristina Bódalo; María Hernández-Lorca; Uxía Fernández-Folgueiras; Sabela Fondevila; Tamara Giménez-Fernández
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.