OBJECTIVE: Mixed venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation are considered possible indicators of the adequacy of oxygen delivery with respect to the oxygen needs of critically ill adult and pediatric patients. The present study was aimed at validating the accuracy of a new technology (Pediasat central venous catheter) in providing a continuous measurement of the central venous oxygen saturation in pediatric patients. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty pediatric patients (age, 6 days-9 years) undergoing cardiac operations. Data obtained with the Pediasat during and after the operation were compared with simultaneously collected venous blood samples analyzed with standard laboratory techniques. SETTING: A clinical research hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A Bland and Altman analysis was performed on 30 matched sets of data collected before cardiopulmonary bypass, during cardiopulmonary bypass, and during the intensive care unit stay. Before cardiopulmonary bypass, there was a bias of 0.003, with lower and upper limits of agreement, -5.84 and 5.84 (percentage error, 17.3%). During cardiopulmonary bypass, the bias was 0.57 and lower and upper limits of agreement were -7.7 and 8.7 (percentage error, 23.2%). At 2 hours after the arrival in the intensive care unit, the bias was -0.6 and the lower and upper limits of agreement were -8 and 6.8 (percentage error, 20.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the minimal bias and the acceptable value of percentage error, the Pediasat may be considered as an accurate tool for the continuous measurement of the central venous oxygen saturation in neonates and pediatric patients during and after cardiac operations.
OBJECTIVE: Mixed venous oxygen saturation and central venous oxygen saturation are considered possible indicators of the adequacy of oxygen delivery with respect to the oxygen needs of critically ill adult and pediatric patients. The present study was aimed at validating the accuracy of a new technology (Pediasat central venous catheter) in providing a continuous measurement of the central venous oxygen saturation in pediatric patients. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty pediatric patients (age, 6 days-9 years) undergoing cardiac operations. Data obtained with the Pediasat during and after the operation were compared with simultaneously collected venous blood samples analyzed with standard laboratory techniques. SETTING: A clinical research hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A Bland and Altman analysis was performed on 30 matched sets of data collected before cardiopulmonary bypass, during cardiopulmonary bypass, and during the intensive care unit stay. Before cardiopulmonary bypass, there was a bias of 0.003, with lower and upper limits of agreement, -5.84 and 5.84 (percentage error, 17.3%). During cardiopulmonary bypass, the bias was 0.57 and lower and upper limits of agreement were -7.7 and 8.7 (percentage error, 23.2%). At 2 hours after the arrival in the intensive care unit, the bias was -0.6 and the lower and upper limits of agreement were -8 and 6.8 (percentage error, 20.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Because of the minimal bias and the acceptable value of percentage error, the Pediasat may be considered as an accurate tool for the continuous measurement of the central venous oxygen saturation in neonates and pediatric patients during and after cardiac operations.
Authors: Rohit S Loomba; Jacqueline Rausa; Danielle Sheikholeslami; Aaron E Dyson; Juan S Farias; Enrique G Villarreal; Saul Flores; Ronald A Bronicki Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Marco Ranucci; Giuseppe Isgrò; Concetta Carlucci; Teresa De La Torre; Stefania Enginoli; Alessandro Frigiola Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Olivier Brissaud; Astrid Botte; Gilles Cambonie; Stéphane Dauger; Laure de Saint Blanquat; Philippe Durand; Véronique Gournay; Elodie Guillet; Daniela Laux; Francis Leclerc; Philippe Mauriat; Thierry Boulain; Khaldoun Kuteifan Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 6.925