Literature DB >> 1883473

Effects on driving performance of visual field defects: a driving simulator study.

P Lövsund1, A Hedin, J Törnros.   

Abstract

To elucidate the possible traffic safety risks induced by visual field defects, a method was developed based on a driving simulator. The capacity to detect stimuli of different sizes appearing in 24 different positions on the screen in front of the driver was measured. Two groups of normal subjects and a number of subjects with different visual field defects were studied. In the groups of normals, the median reaction times were fairly homogenous. There was a slight difference between central and peripheral stimuli, which was somewhat larger for the older subjects. Among the subjects with field defects, the individual variations were very dominant. Very few of these showed a capacity to compensate for their deficiency. In order to gain insight into possible compensatory mechanisms of these persons, eye movement recordings were made. The results indicate that the visual search pattern may be of importance in this respect. Some comparisons with respect to detection capacity were also made with one-eyed subjects and with optically generated field restrictions (spectacles and spectacle frames).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1883473     DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(91)90011-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is a one eyed racing driver safe to compete? Formula one (eye) or two?

Authors:  W Westlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the sensitivity of the CRCDS Mini-Sim to the next-day residual effects of zopiclone.

Authors:  Arthur A Simen; Cynthia Gargano; Jang-Ho Cha; Melissa Drexel; An Bautmans; Ingeborg Heirman; Tine Laethem; Thomas Hochadel; Lien Gheyle; Kim Bleys; Chan Beals; Aubrey Stoch; Gary G Kay; Arie Struyk
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2015-06

Review 3.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  The Impact of Visual Field Loss on Driving Skills: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Authors:  Gemma Patterson; Claire Howard; Lauren Hepworth; Fiona Rowe
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2019-04-16

5.  Change blindness in simulated driving in individuals with homonymous visual field loss.

Authors:  Garrett Swan; Jing Xu; Vilte Baliutaviciute; Alex Bowers
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-05-15

6.  Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Eli Peli; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Driving with hemianopia: IV. Head scanning and detection at intersections in a simulator.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Egor Ananyev; Aaron J Mandel; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Effects of driver compensatory behaviour on risks of critical pedestrian collisions under simulated visual field defects.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Makoto Itoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.