Literature DB >> 1883464

The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers.

A J McKnight1, D Shinar, B Hilburn.   

Abstract

This study compared the performance of 40 monocular and 40 binocular tractor-trailer drivers on measures of both visual and driving performance. On the visual measures, the mononuclear drivers were significantly deficient in contrast sensitivity, visual acuity under low illumination and glare, and binocular depth perception. They were not significantly deficient in static or dynamic visual acuity, visual field of individual eyes, or glare recovery. Driving measures of visual search, lane keeping, clearance judgment, gap judgment, hazard detection, and information recognition showed no differences between monocular and binocular drivers. Monocular drives were poorer than binocular drivers only in sign reading distance in both daytime and nighttime driving. This decrement correlated significantly with the binocular depth perception measure. There were large individual differences within each group for most of the visual and driving performance measures. It was concluded that monocular drivers have some significant reductions in selected visual capabilities and in certain driving functions dependent on these abilities, compared with binocular drivers. However, monocular drivers are not significantly worse than binocular drivers in the safety of most day-to-day driving functions. Implications of these findings and the large individual differences within each group are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1883464     DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(91)90002-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  16 in total

Review 1.  Is a one eyed racing driver safe to compete? Formula one (eye) or two?

Authors:  W Westlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Vision and driving.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sensory impairment and driving: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  R Q Ivers; P Mitchell; R G Cumming
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Field Expansion for Acquired Monocular Vision Using a Multiplexing Prism.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Jung; Eli Peli
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; David C Knill; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Driver licensing and motor vehicle crash rates among young adults with amblyopia and unilateral vision impairment.

Authors:  Julia M Baker; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Allison E Curry
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Health-related quality of life after surgical removal of an eye.

Authors:  Takaaki Kondo; Walter T Tillman; Terry L Schwartz; John V Linberg; J Vernon Odom
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  Advantage of binocularity in the presence of external visual noise.

Authors:  Joanna M Otto; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Binocular visual deficits at mid to high spatial frequency in treated amblyopes.

Authors:  Shijia Chen; Seung Hyun Min; Ziyun Cheng; Yue Xiong; Xi Yu; Lili Wei; Yu Mao; Robert F Hess; Jiawei Zhou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-12

10.  Visual fitness of public vehicle drivers in southeast of iran.

Authors:  Ali Sharifi; Hamid Sharifi; Mohammad Karamouzian; Elham Daneshtalab; Ali Daneshtalab
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.