OBJECTIVES: To measure postural control in extremely preterm infants with a birth weight of less than 1,500 g in comparison to full-term infants at 7 years of age and healthy adults. PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On a Balance Master computerized force plate, static and dynamic postural control was measured in 21 full-term 7-year-old children, 44 extremely preterm 7-year-old children, and 19 healthy adults. The test battery consisted of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance, the rhythmic weight shift, the walk across, and the tandem walk tests. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic, prospective, single-center cohort study. RESULTS: Static and dynamic postural control was significantly better in adults than in children at 7 years of age. In most parameters, static and dynamic postural control was not significantly different between full-term and preterm infants with very low birth weight at 7 years of age. Only the ratio of intended to extraneous movement, that is, the left-right directional control, was significantly lower during the left-right rhythmic weight shift for almost all parameters in the study group of preterm infants. CONCLUSION: Postural control still is not fully developed in infants at early school age. At this age, formerly extremely preterm infants without major neurological disorders have almost caught up to the postural control of healthy full-term subjects.
OBJECTIVES: To measure postural control in extremely preterm infants with a birth weight of less than 1,500 g in comparison to full-term infants at 7 years of age and healthy adults. PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: On a Balance Master computerized force plate, static and dynamic postural control was measured in 21 full-term 7-year-old children, 44 extremely preterm 7-year-old children, and 19 healthy adults. The test battery consisted of the modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance, the rhythmic weight shift, the walk across, and the tandem walk tests. INTERVENTION: Diagnostic, prospective, single-center cohort study. RESULTS: Static and dynamic postural control was significantly better in adults than in children at 7 years of age. In most parameters, static and dynamic postural control was not significantly different between full-term and preterm infants with very low birth weight at 7 years of age. Only the ratio of intended to extraneous movement, that is, the left-right directional control, was significantly lower during the left-right rhythmic weight shift for almost all parameters in the study group of preterm infants. CONCLUSION: Postural control still is not fully developed in infants at early school age. At this age, formerly extremely preterm infants without major neurological disorders have almost caught up to the postural control of healthy full-term subjects.
Authors: Katarzyna Walicka-Cupryś; Justyna Drzał-Grabiec; Maciej Rachwał; Paweł Piwoński; Lidia Perenc; Łukasz Przygoda; Katarzyna Zajkiewicz Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 3.411