Literature DB >> 18832978

Longitudinal study of visual discomfort symptoms in college students.

Eric Borsting1, Chris Chase, Chinatsu Tosha, William H Ridder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the variation of visual discomfort symptom reporting in a group of college students over a 1 year period.
METHODS: Subjects were screened for visual acuity and uncorrected refractive error before participating in the study. A survey of visual discomfort developed by Conlon et al., Vis Cogn 1999;6:637-666, and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) were administered to a group of 23 college students twice with approximately 1 year between administrations. All subjects also completed two clinical assessments of accommodation and vergence.
RESULTS: The mean time between administrations of the symptom surveys was 13 months. There was no clinically significant mean difference between the first and second administration of both visual discomfort surveys. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.82 for the Conlon et al., Vis Cogn 1999;6:637-666 survey and 0.85 for the CISS. The 95% limits of agreement for the Conlon et al., Vis Cogn 1999;6:637-666 survey was -18.44, 17.92 and for the CISS was -14.36, 13.36. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the optometric tests ranged from 0.38 to 0.83.
CONCLUSIONS: Visual discomfort symptoms were found to be stable in the majority of young college students over a 1 year period. However, a minority of students showed large variability between the two administrations of the surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18832978     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818883cd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of visual stress symptoms in age-matched dyslexic, Meares-Irlen syndrome and normal adults.

Authors:  Mana A Alanazi; Saud A Alanazi; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Fruit and vegetable consumption and its relation to risk of asthenopia among Chinese college students.

Authors:  Fang Guo; Qiang Zhang; Meng-Nan Fan; Le Ma; Chu Chen; Xiao-Hong Liu; Hong Jiang; Yan Liu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies.

Authors:  Ángel García-Muñoz; Stela Carbonell-Bonete; Pilar Cacho-Martínez
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-07-15

4.  Characterization of Visual Symptomatology Associated with Refractive, Accommodative, and Binocular Anomalies.

Authors:  Pilar Cacho-Martínez; Mario Cantó-Cerdán; Stela Carbonell-Bonete; Ángel García-Muñoz
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-16       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Diagnostic validity of clinical signs associated with a large exophoria at near.

Authors:  Pilar Cacho-Martínez; Angel García-Muñoz; María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Accommodative changes after SMILE for moderate to high myopia correction.

Authors:  Ke Zheng; Tian Han; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Development of the Japanese version of the Visual Discomfort Scale.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Shinichi Koyama; Yoshihiko Tanno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Accommodation changes after visian implantable collamer lens with central hole for high myopia: A STROBE-compliant article.

Authors:  Minjie Chen; Qiurong Long; Hao Gu; Jiaxu Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Visual Sensitivity in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia: An Online Study.

Authors:  Antonia F Ten Brink; Janet H Bultitude
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Factor structure of the convergence insufficiency symptom survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Amélia Fernandes Nunes; Pedro Lourenço Monteiro; António Santos Nunes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.