OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of efavirenz versus nevirapine in initial antiretroviral therapy regimens for adults in sub-Saharan Africa. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: Study participants were 2817 HIV-infected, highly active antiretroviral therapy-naive adults who began nevirapine-based or efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy between January 1998 and September 2004 via a private-sector HIV/AIDS program in nine countries of southern Africa. The primary outcome was time to virologic failure (two measurements of viral loads >or=400 copies/ml). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, time to viral load less than 400 copies/ml, pharmacy-claim adherence, and discontinuation of nevirapine or efavirenz without virologic failure. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 2.0 years (interquartile range 1.2-2.6). Patients started on nevirapine were significantly less likely than those started on efavirenz to achieve high adherence, whether defined as 100% (30.2 versus 38.1%, P < 0.002) or more than 90% (44.8 versus 49.4%, P < 0.02) pharmacy-claim adherence. In a multivariate analysis, patients on nevirapine had greater risk of virologic failure [hazard ratio (HR 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.86)], death (2.17; 1.31-3.60), and regimen discontinuation (1.67; 1.32-2.11). Switching from nevirapine to efavirenz had no significant virologic effect, whereas switching from efavirenz to nevirapine resulted in significantly slower time to suppression (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.93) and faster time to failure (hazard ratio 3.92; 95% confidence interval 1.61-9.55) than remaining on efavirenz. CONCLUSION: In initial highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens, efavirenz was associated with superior virologic and clinical outcomes than nevirapine, suggesting that efavirenz might be the preferred nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in resource-limited settings. However, its higher cost and potential teratogenicity are important barriers to implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of efavirenz versus nevirapine in initial antiretroviral therapy regimens for adults in sub-Saharan Africa. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: Study participants were 2817 HIV-infected, highly active antiretroviral therapy-naive adults who began nevirapine-based or efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy between January 1998 and September 2004 via a private-sector HIV/AIDS program in nine countries of southern Africa. The primary outcome was time to virologic failure (two measurements of viral loads >or=400 copies/ml). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, time to viral load less than 400 copies/ml, pharmacy-claim adherence, and discontinuation of nevirapine or efavirenz without virologic failure. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 2.0 years (interquartile range 1.2-2.6). Patients started on nevirapine were significantly less likely than those started on efavirenz to achieve high adherence, whether defined as 100% (30.2 versus 38.1%, P < 0.002) or more than 90% (44.8 versus 49.4%, P < 0.02) pharmacy-claim adherence. In a multivariate analysis, patients on nevirapine had greater risk of virologic failure [hazard ratio (HR 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.86)], death (2.17; 1.31-3.60), and regimen discontinuation (1.67; 1.32-2.11). Switching from nevirapine to efavirenz had no significant virologic effect, whereas switching from efavirenz to nevirapine resulted in significantly slower time to suppression (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.93) and faster time to failure (hazard ratio 3.92; 95% confidence interval 1.61-9.55) than remaining on efavirenz. CONCLUSION: In initial highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens, efavirenz was associated with superior virologic and clinical outcomes than nevirapine, suggesting that efavirenz might be the preferred nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in resource-limited settings. However, its higher cost and potential teratogenicity are important barriers to implementation.
Authors: Marina Núñez; Vincent Soriano; Luz Martín-Carbonero; Ana Barrios; Pablo Barreiro; Francisco Blanco; Teresa García-Benayas; Juan González-Lahoz Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2002 May-Jun
Authors: Robert S Hogg; Katherine Heath; David Bangsberg; Benita Yip; Natasha Press; Michael V O'Shaughnessy; Julio S G Montaner Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-05-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Joel E Gallant; Schlomo Staszewski; Anton L Pozniak; Edwin DeJesus; Jamal M A H Suleiman; Michael D Miller; Dion F Coakley; Biao Lu; John J Toole; Andrew K Cheng Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-07-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roy M Gulick; Heather J Ribaudo; Cecilia M Shikuma; Stephanie Lustgarten; Kathleen E Squires; William A Meyer; Edward P Acosta; Bruce R Schackman; Christopher D Pilcher; Robert L Murphy; William E Maher; Mallory D Witt; Richard C Reichman; Sally Snyder; Karin L Klingman; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F van Leth; P Phanuphak; K Ruxrungtham; E Baraldi; S Miller; B Gazzard; P Cahn; U G Lalloo; I P van der Westhuizen; D R Malan; M A Johnson; B R Santos; F Mulcahy; R Wood; G C Levi; G Reboredo; K Squires; I Cassetti; D Petit; F Raffi; C Katlama; R L Murphy; A Horban; J P Dam; E Hassink; R van Leeuwen; P Robinson; F W Wit; J M A Lange Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-04-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jane Hitti; Lisa M Frenkel; Alice M Stek; Sharon A Nachman; David Baker; Adolfo Gonzalez-Garcia; Arthur Provisor; Edwin M Thorpe; Mary E Paul; Marc Foca; Jorge Gandia; Sharon Huang; Lee-Jen Wei; Laura M Stevens; D Heather Watts; James McNamara Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Mhairi Maskew; Alana T Brennan; A Patrick MacPhail; Ian M Sanne; Matthew P Fox Journal: J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic) Date: 2011-09-27
Authors: C William Wester; Ann Muir Thomas; Hermann Bussmann; Sikhulile Moyo; Joseph M Makhema; Tendani Gaolathe; Vladimir Novitsky; Max Essex; Victor deGruttola; Richard G Marlink Journal: AIDS Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Max R O'Donnell; Nesri Padayatchi; Amrita Daftary; Catherine Orrell; Kelly E Dooley; K Rivet Amico; Gerald Friedland Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Myres W Tilghman; Don Diego Guerena; Alexei Licea; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Douglas D Richman; Susanne May; Davey M Smith Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Eric N Ouattara; Xavier Anglaret; Angela Y Wong; Jennifer Chu; Heather E Hsu; Christine Danel; Serge Eholié; Raoul Moh; Delphine Gabillard; Rochelle P Walensky; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Sara Mursleen; James H Irlam; Alicen B Spaulding; George W Rutherford; Nandi Siegfried Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-12-10