Literature DB >> 18832199

Evaluation of molecular methods for the detection of Brucella species in water buffalo milk.

C Marianelli1, A Martucciello, M Tarantino, R Vecchio, G Iovane, G Galiero.   

Abstract

Brucellosis is a highly infectious disease affecting both animals and humans. The current standard tools for the diagnosis of this bacterial infection are serological and microbiological. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of molecular assays as diagnostic tools for the detection of Brucella spp. in water buffalo milk. For this purpose, we first compared different DNA extraction protocols and PCR methods on artificially spiked milk samples. The most sensitive methods were then used to examine milk from serologically positive and negative water buffaloes. Molecular results were compared with serological and bacteriological test results. Milk samples from 53 Brucella seropositive buffaloes (by either rose Bengal or complement fixation test) were positive by ELISA, 37 were positive by culture, 33 were positive by PCR, and 35 were positive by real-time PCR. Of the 37 culture-positive samples, a total of 25 and 26 were positive by PCR and real-time PCR, respectively. Of the 16 culture-negative samples, 8 were positive by PCR and 9 by real-time PCR. Thus, although culture showed greater sensitivity than PCR, some animals found positive by serological methods and PCR tested negative by milk culture. The combined use of bacteriological and molecular tools increased the number of positive samples to 46. In conclusion, these results suggest that the simultaneous application of these 2 direct detection methods (culture and PCR) could be more useful than one test alone for the diagnosis of Brucella spp. in buffalo milk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18832199     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  6 in total

1.  Detection of Brucella sp. infection through serological, microbiological, and molecular methods applied to buffaloes in Maranhão State, Brazil.

Authors:  Larissa Sarmento Dos Santos; Joicy Cortez Sá; Diego Luiz Dos Santos Ribeiro; Nancyleni Pinto Chaves; Juliana Pinto da Silva Mol; Renato Lima Santos; Tatiane Alves da Paixão; Alcina Vieira de Carvalho Neta
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Characterization and evaluation of an arbitrary primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) product for the specific detection of Brucella species.

Authors:  Jafar A Qasem; Sabah AlMomin; Salwa A Al-Mouqati; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  Diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock and wildlife.

Authors:  Jacques Godfroid; Klaus Nielsen; Claude Saegerman
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.351

4.  Detection of Brucella abortus DNA in aborted goats and sheep in Egypt by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Gamal Wareth; Falk Melzer; Herbert Tomaso; Uwe Roesler; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-06-03

5.  Isolation of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis from Seronegative Cows is a Serious Impediment in Brucellosis Control.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Diasty; Gamal Wareth; Falk Melzer; Shawky Mustafa; Lisa D Sprague; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-09

6.  Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in Buffalo Worldwide and Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Shi; Qing-Long Gong; Bo Zhao; Bao-Yi Ma; Zi-Yang Chen; Yang Yang; Yu-Han Sun; Qi Wang; Xue Leng; Ying Zong; Jian-Ming Li; Rui Du
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.