Literature DB >> 18831601

Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects.

Kazushi Maruya1, Hiroki Watanabe, Masataka Watanabe.   

Abstract

After prolonged exposure to moving stimuli, illusory motion is perceived in stimuli that do not contain consistent motion, a phenomenon termed the motion aftereffect (MAE). In this study, we tested MAEs under binocular suppression that renders the motion adaptor invisible for the entire adaptation period. We developed a variant of the continuous flash suppression method to reliably suppress target motion stimuli for durations longer than several tens of seconds. Here, we ask whether motion systems are functional in the absence of perception by measuring the MAE, a question difficult to address using binocular rivalry that accompanies a switch of percept between visible and invisible. Results show that both the MAEs with static and dynamic tests are attenuated with an invisible adaptor when the adaptor and the test stimulus are presented to the same eye. In contrast, when the test pattern was presented to the other eye, the dynamic MAE was observed in invisible adaptor conditions. These results indicate that low-level adaptation survives under total binocular suppression, a finding predicted by previous studies. In contrast, disappearance of interocular transfer in the dynamic MAE suggests that a high-level motion detector does not operate when the motion adaptor is rendered invisible.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18831601     DOI: 10.1167/8.11.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  25 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Opposing effects of attention and consciousness on afterimages.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Perceptual and neural consequences of rapid motion adaptation.

Authors:  Davis M Glasser; James M G Tsui; Christopher C Pack; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Suppressive mechanisms in visual motion processing: From perception to intelligence.

Authors:  Duje Tadin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Jan Brascamp; David J Heeger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Directional remapping in tactile inter-finger apparent motion: a motion aftereffect study.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Kunihiko Mabuchi; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motion and tilt aftereffects occur largely in retinal, not in object, coordinates in the Ternus-Pikler display.

Authors:  Marco Boi; Haluk Oğmen; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Semantic and spatial congruency mould audiovisual integration depending on perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Patrycja Delong; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Non-conscious processing of motion coherence can boost conscious access.

Authors:  Lisandro Kaunitz; Alessio Fracasso; Angelika Lingnau; David Melcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.