The VATS lobectomist: analysis of costs and alterations in the traditional surgical working pattern in the modern surgical unit.

It is beyond the scope of this article to review the advantages of VATS lobectomy, but the data in support of this technique are increasing progressively. There is excellent evidence to support the oncologic equivalence and safety profile as compared with open thoracotomy, and data that demonstrate the reduced pain associated with VATS resection. Also, reduction in immune disturbance provides a tantalizing glimpse of one additional potential modality of benefit for less traumatic surgery. Unfortunately, in the economic world, equivalence, preferably with less cost, is the test applied. Whatever the societal benefit of improved quality of life following surgery, this has no cost benefit attached. From the foregoing discussion one can conclude that VATS lobectomy is no more costly than open resection and does generate additional hospital beds. The authors remain uncertain as to the preferred form of VATS lobectomy but it seems that the reduced trauma of the endoscopic procedure is associated with more benefit in terms of shorter hospitalization albeit at the cost of some increase in operating time. VATS techniques and lobectomy sit comfortably within the structure of any thoracic unit requiring little adjustment to established process. It is likely that ultimately 30% or thereabouts of major pulmonary resection will be undertaken using this technique and that VATS interventions will aid patient assessment regardless of stage or ultimate intended therapy. Competency and responsible use remain paramount considerations.