BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was to evaluate the efficacy of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in colorectal cancer together with other established regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chemosensitivities of 114 colorectal cancer patients to established regimens (fluorouracil (5-FU with leucovorin (FL), capecitabine, FL with irinotecan (FLIRI), and FL with oxaliplatin (FLOX)) as well as five hydroxamic acid derivatives (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, PXD101, and three novel candidates of CG-1, CG-2, and CG-3) were comparatively evaluated using the histoculture drug response assay. RESULTS: The chemosensitivity with established regimens was between 34.2% and 52.6%, when the cutoff value of the inhibition ratio was set at 30%, and between 54.5% and 84.1% with HDAC inhibitors. All HDAC inhibitors displayed synergistic effects in combination with established regimens of FLOX and FLIRI (P < or = 0.0001-0.002). Advanced T- and N-category tumors and patients with synchronous adenoma displayed higher chemosensitivity to CG-3, CG-2, and CG-1, respectively, on a multivariate analysis (P = 0.023, 0.044, and 0.045, respectively). Tumors with mismatch repair defects were closely correlated with chemosensitivities to combined regimens of PDX101 with FLOX and FLIRI (P = 0.044 and 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings firstly demonstrated the chemo-responsiveness of colorectal cancers to HDAC inhibitors with therapeutic efficacy comparable to the established regimens. Additionally, tumor growth and heredity were significantly associated with specific regimens, supporting their possible role as chemosensitive predictors.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study was to evaluate the efficacy of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in colorectal cancer together with other established regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chemosensitivities of 114 colorectal cancerpatients to established regimens (fluorouracil (5-FU with leucovorin (FL), capecitabine, FL with irinotecan (FLIRI), and FL with oxaliplatin (FLOX)) as well as five hydroxamic acid derivatives (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, PXD101, and three novel candidates of CG-1, CG-2, and CG-3) were comparatively evaluated using the histoculture drug response assay. RESULTS: The chemosensitivity with established regimens was between 34.2% and 52.6%, when the cutoff value of the inhibition ratio was set at 30%, and between 54.5% and 84.1% with HDAC inhibitors. All HDAC inhibitors displayed synergistic effects in combination with established regimens of FLOX and FLIRI (P < or = 0.0001-0.002). Advanced T- and N-category tumors and patients with synchronous adenoma displayed higher chemosensitivity to CG-3, CG-2, and CG-1, respectively, on a multivariate analysis (P = 0.023, 0.044, and 0.045, respectively). Tumors with mismatch repair defects were closely correlated with chemosensitivities to combined regimens of PDX101 with FLOX and FLIRI (P = 0.044 and 0.048, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings firstly demonstrated the chemo-responsiveness of colorectal cancers to HDAC inhibitors with therapeutic efficacy comparable to the established regimens. Additionally, tumor growth and heredity were significantly associated with specific regimens, supporting their possible role as chemosensitive predictors.
Authors: K Yonekura; Y Basaki; L Chikahisa; S Okabe; A Hashimoto; K Miyadera; K Wierzba; Y Yamada Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Anthony Tumber; Laura S Collins; Kamille Dumong Petersen; Annemette Thougaard; Sanne J Christiansen; Marielle Dejligbjerg; Peter Buhl Jensen; Maxwell Sehested; James W A Ritchie Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2006-11-24 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Matthias Ocker; Abdullah Alajati; Marion Ganslmayer; Steffen Zopf; Mike Lüders; Daniel Neureiter; Eckhart G Hahn; Detlef Schuppan; Christoph Herold Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Pauline A Whitehouse; Louise A Knight; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Stuart J Mercer; Sanjay Sharma; Ian A Cree Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Elizabeth K Broussard; Rachel Kim; Jesse C Wiley; Juan Pablo Marquez; James E Annis; David Pritchard; Mary L Disis Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2013-05-16
Authors: Kristina R Gopčević; Branislav R Rovčanin; Svetislav B Tatić; Zoran V Krivokapić; Milan M Gajić; Vesna V Dragutinović Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-04-27 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Dmitriy I Dovzhanskiy; Stefanie M Arnold; Thilo Hackert; Ina Oehme; Olaf Witt; Klaus Felix; Nathalia Giese; Jens Werner Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-06-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: M Nikbakht Dastjerdi; M R Salahshoor; M Mardani; M Rabbani; B Hashemibeni; M Gharagozloo; M Kazemi; N Esmaeil; Sh Roshankhah; R Golmohammadi; M Mobarakian Journal: Res Pharm Sci Date: 2013-04
Authors: Madeleine Hewish; Christopher J Lord; Sarah A Martin; David Cunningham; Alan Ashworth Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Seon Ae Roh; Eun Young Choi; Dong Hyung Cho; Yong Sik Yoon; Tae Won Kim; Yong Sung Kim; Jin Cheon Kim Journal: J Korean Surg Soc Date: 2012-06-26
Authors: Mohammad Reza Salahshoor; Mehdi Nikbakht Dastjerdi; Cyrus Jalili; Mohammad Mardani; Mozafar Khazaei; Ahmad Shabanizadeh Darehdor; Ali Valiani; Shiva Roshankhah Journal: Int J Prev Med Date: 2013-12