| Literature DB >> 18830453 |
Chung-Hua Hsu1, Kung-Chang Hwang, Chung-Liang Chao, Steve G N Chang, Mei-Shang Ho, Jaung-Geng Lin, Hen-Hong Chang, Shung-Te Kao, Yi-Ming Chen, Pesus Chou.
Abstract
Natural herbal medicine (NHM) has been used to control infectious diseases for thousands of years. In view of the possible beneficial effect of NHM on SARS, we conducted this study to examine whether NHM is of any benefit as a supplementary treatment of SARS or SARS-like infectious disease. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Twenty-eight patients fulfilled the WHO inclusion criteria and our exclusion criteria. All enrolled patients received routine western-medicine treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the three supplementary treatment groups: NHM A (Group A, n = 9) NHM B (Group B, n = 9) or placebo (Group C, n = 10). Chest X-ray was done every 1 or 2 days for every patient. Reading radiologists use a standard 0-3 scoring system (0: no infiltration; 1: focal haziness or even small patchy lesion; 2: ground glass picture; 3: lobar consolidation) according to the severity of infiltration in each lung field (three lung fields in both right and left lungs). The main outcome measurements were the improving chest radiographic scores (IRS) and the duration (days) till improvement (DI). One patient from the placebo group passed away. Patients from NHM A took less days before showing improvement (6.7 +/- 1.8) compared with placebo group (11.2 +/- 4.9), which showed statistical significance (P = 0.04). The cases were too few to be conclusive, the initial observations seem to indicate NHM appears to be safe in non-criticallly ill patients and clinical trials are feasible in the setting of pandemic outbreaks.Entities:
Keywords: SARS; avian influenza; nature herbal medicine
Year: 2008 PMID: 18830453 PMCID: PMC2529389 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nem035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Inclusion (WHO criteria9) and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria |
| Suspect case |
| A person presenting with history of high fever (>38°C) AND cough or breathing difficulty |
| And one or more of the following exposures during the 10 days prior to onset of symptoms: |
| - close contact with a person who is a suspect or probable case of SARS; |
| - history of travel to an area with recent local transmission of SARS |
| - residing in an area with recent local transmission of SARS |
| Probable case |
| (i) A suspect case with radiographic evidence of infiltrates consistent with pneumonia or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) on chest X-ray (CXR). |
| (ii) A suspect case of SARS that is positive for SARS coronavirus by one or more assays. |
| Exclusion criteria |
| At the time of entry into the study, a case should be excluded: |
| (I) If an alternative diagnosis can fully explain the illness. |
| (II) Age <18 and >55 years |
| (III) More than 10 days from the date of onset of fever, on endotrachea tube, or in severe conditions with other multiple medical problems. |
| (IV) GOT, GPT > 100 U/l, serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl |
| (V) Breastfeeding or pregnant women. |
| (VI) Taken any Chinese herbs in the last 3 months |
| (VII) Any other conditions not suitable for trial as evaluated by the physician on duty. |
Figure 1.Trial profile.
Natural herbal medicine A composition
| Chinese name | Pharmaceutical name | Dose (gm) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shi Gao | 16 | 13.3 | |
| Chai Hu | 12 | 10 | |
| Zhi Zi | 12 | 10 | |
| Fang Fong | 10 | 8.3 | |
| Huang Gin | 10 | 8.3 | |
| Qiang Huo | 8 | 6.7 | |
| Jing Jie | 8 | 6.7 | |
| Fu Ling | 8 | 6.7 | |
| Shao Yao | 8 | 6.7 | |
| Ban Xia | 8 | 6.7 | |
| Hua Xiang | 8 | 6.7 | |
| Jie Geng | 6 | 5 | |
| Mai Men Dong | 6 | 5 |
Patients’ characteristics at entry
| Group A Mean (SD) ( | Group B Mean (SD) ( | Group C Mean (SD) ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | ||||
| Age, years old | 34.8 (9.4) | 39.9 (13.2) | 39.5 (8.8) | 0.46 |
| Sex ratio, ♀: ♂ | 3:5 | 5:3 | 4:4 | 0.61 |
| Positive of PCR or antibody rate | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.84 |
| Days after disease onset before enrolled in the trial | 3.3 (1.0) | 3.3 (2.0) | 3.5 (1.6) | 0.94 |
| Initial vital signs | ||||
| Body temperature, °C | 38.5 (0.8) | 38.1 (0.7) | 38.4 (0.8) | 0.56 |
| Systolic blood pressure; mmHg | 121.0 (16.1) | 121.1 (16.8) | 118.8 (16.1) | 0.65 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 77.6 (13.6) | 77.4 (15.0) | 69.8 (13.3) | 0.45 |
| Respiratory rate, times/min | 21.8 (1.2) | 21.1 (1.7) | 22.6 (4.4) | 0.57 |
| Heart rate, beats/min | 95.3 (13.6) | 99.8 (17.2) | 95.5 (19.3) | 0.84 |
| O2 saturation‡ (%) on room air | 97.5 (1.4) | 95.4 (4.0) | 97.6 (1.0) | 0.16 |
| Initial symptoms rate | ||||
| Fever (>38°C) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Cough | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.36 |
| Diarrhea | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.11 |
| Received drug rate | ||||
| Robatrol | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.35 |
| Intravenous immunoglobulin | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.58 |
| Steroid | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.61 |
| Antibiotics | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.00 |
| Initial data | ||||
| Radiographic scores | 2.1 (1.2) | 2.5 (1.6) | 3.0 (2.7) | 0.67 |
| Lymphocytes, 10−9/l | 1.4 (0.7) | 1.0 (0.7) | 1.3 (0.6) | 0.71 |
| Platelets, 10−9/l | 235.1 (150.1) | 186.8 (56.9) | 182.5 (74.6) | 0.66 |
| Creatine Kinase, U/l | 281.5 (360.1) | 188.3 (130.9) | 156.3 (92.6) | 0.53 |
| Lactate dehydrogenase, U/l | 268.8 (132.9) | 287.0 (120.8) | 194.5 (46.3) | 0.21 |
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 1.0 (0.4) | 1.0 (0.2) | 0.9 (0.3) | 0.93 |
Analysis of outcomes
| Group A ( | Group B ( | Group C ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcomes | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | A, B | B, C | A, C |
| Chest radiographic scores | ||||||
| Initial (IS) | 2.1 (1.2) | 2.5 (1.6) | 3.0 (2.7) | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.43 |
| Maximal (MS) | 5.9 (3.5) | 5.6 (3.4) | 7.9 (4.0) | 0.85 | 0.23 | 0.31 |
| Final (FS) | 0.7 (0.9) | 0.5 (0.6) | 2.7 (3.4) | 0.75 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| IRS | 5.3 (3.7) | 5.0 (3.5) | 5.6 (4.7) | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.99 |
| Duration (days) till improvement | ||||||
| Worsening (DW) | 5.5 (4.2) | 3.8 (2.8) | 7.8 (5.7) | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.37 |
| Improvement (DI) | 6.7 (1.8) | 9.2 (5.9) | 11.2 (4.9) | 0.28 | 0.47 | 0.04 |
| Course (DC) | 12.2 (5.0) | 13.0 (7.8) | 19.0 (10.0) | 0.81 | 0.20 | 0.11 |
aIRS (Improving Radiographic Scores), MS – FS; bDW, Duration (days) between IS to MS; cDI, Duration (days) between MS to FS; dDC, DW+DI [Duration (days)].