PURPOSE: Interleukin 21 (IL-21) is a promising new cytokine, which is undergoing clinical testing as an anticancer agent. Although IL-21 provides potent stimulation of CD8(+) T cells, it has also been suggested that IL-21 is immunosuppressive by counteracting the maturation of dendritic cells. The dissociation of these two opposing effects may enhance the utility of IL-21 as an immunotherapeutic. In this study, we used a cell-based artificial antigen-presenting cell (aAPC) lacking a functional IL-21 receptor (IL-21R) to investigate the immunostimulatory properties of IL-21. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The immunosuppressive activity of IL-21 was studied using human IL-21R(+) dendritic cells. Antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells stimulated with human cell-based IL-21R(-)aAPC were used to isolate the T-cell immunostimulatory effects of IL-21. The functional outcomes, including phenotype, cytokine production, proliferation, and cytotoxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: IL-21 limits the immune response by maintaining immunologically immature dendritic cells. However, stimulation of CD8(+) T cells with IL-21R(-) aAPC, which secrete IL-21, results in significant expansion. Although priming in the presence of IL-21 temporarily modulated the T-cell phenotype, chronic stimulation abrogated these differences. Importantly, exposure to IL-21 during restimulation promoted the enrichment and expansion of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells that maintained IL-2 secretion and gained enhanced IFN-gamma secretion. Tumor antigen-specific CTL generated in the presence of IL-21 recognized tumor cells efficiently, demonstrating potent effector functions. CONCLUSIONS: IL-21 induces opposing effects on antigen-presenting cells and CD8(+) T cells. Strategic application of IL-21 is required to induce optimal clinical effects and may enable the generation of large numbers of highly avid tumor-specific CTL for adoptive immunotherapy.
PURPOSE:Interleukin 21 (IL-21) is a promising new cytokine, which is undergoing clinical testing as an anticancer agent. Although IL-21 provides potent stimulation of CD8(+) T cells, it has also been suggested that IL-21 is immunosuppressive by counteracting the maturation of dendritic cells. The dissociation of these two opposing effects may enhance the utility of IL-21 as an immunotherapeutic. In this study, we used a cell-based artificial antigen-presenting cell (aAPC) lacking a functional IL-21 receptor (IL-21R) to investigate the immunostimulatory properties of IL-21. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The immunosuppressive activity of IL-21 was studied using humanIL-21R(+) dendritic cells. Antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells stimulated with human cell-based IL-21R(-)aAPC were used to isolate the T-cell immunostimulatory effects of IL-21. The functional outcomes, including phenotype, cytokine production, proliferation, and cytotoxicity were evaluated. RESULTS:IL-21 limits the immune response by maintaining immunologically immature dendritic cells. However, stimulation of CD8(+) T cells with IL-21R(-) aAPC, which secrete IL-21, results in significant expansion. Although priming in the presence of IL-21 temporarily modulated the T-cell phenotype, chronic stimulation abrogated these differences. Importantly, exposure to IL-21 during restimulation promoted the enrichment and expansion of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells that maintained IL-2 secretion and gained enhanced IFN-gamma secretion. Tumor antigen-specific CTL generated in the presence of IL-21 recognized tumor cells efficiently, demonstrating potent effector functions. CONCLUSIONS:IL-21 induces opposing effects on antigen-presenting cells and CD8(+) T cells. Strategic application of IL-21 is required to induce optimal clinical effects and may enable the generation of large numbers of highly avid tumor-specific CTL for adoptive immunotherapy.
Authors: Anjum S Kaka; Donald R Shaffer; Ryan Hartmaier; Ryan Hartmeier; Ann M Leen; An Lu; Adham Bear; Cliona M Rooney; Aaron E Foster Journal: J Immunother Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.456
Authors: Makito Tanaka; Marcus O Butler; Sascha Ansén; Osamu Imataki; Alla Berezovskaya; Lee M Nadler; Naoto Hirano Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marcus O Butler; Sascha Ansén; Makito Tanaka; Osamu Imataki; Alla Berezovskaya; Mary M Mooney; Genita Metzler; Matthew I Milstein; Lee M Nadler; Naoto Hirano Journal: Int Immunol Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 4.823
Authors: Osamu Imataki; Sascha Ansén; Makito Tanaka; Marcus O Butler; Alla Berezovskaya; Matthew I Milstein; Kiyotaka Kuzushima; Lee M Nadler; Naoto Hirano Journal: J Immunol Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Cecele J Denman; Vladimir V Senyukov; Srinivas S Somanchi; Prasad V Phatarpekar; Lisa M Kopp; Jennifer L Johnson; Harjeet Singh; Lenka Hurton; Sourindra N Maiti; M Helen Huls; Richard E Champlin; Laurence J N Cooper; Dean A Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Saskia Jam Santegoets; Annelies W Turksma; Daniel J Powell; Erik Hooijberg; Tanja D de Gruijl Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 8.110