Literature DB >> 18829420

[The use of deodorants/antiperspirants does not constitute a risk factor for breast cancer].

Moïse Namer1, Elisabeth Luporsi, Joseph Gligorov, François Lokiec, Marc Spielmann.   

Abstract

Based on the observation of a high incidence of breast cancer in the upper outer quadrant adjacent to the usual area of application of deodorants and/or antiperspirants, several scientific teams have advanced the hypothesis of a possible link between antiperspirants and breast cancer. The possibility of the involvement of parabens and aluminium salts, traditional components of a number of cosmetic products, has been advanced by the same teams. In order to ascertain whether this hypothesis could or could not be confirmed, a group of clinical experts in oncology was set up to search and analyse the literature data relating to the problem raised with the aim of answering three predefined questions: 1) does it exist experimental or biological arguments supporting a potential link between the use of deodorants/antiperspirants and breast cancer? 2) Does the use of deodorants/antiperspirants have any effect on the increase in the risk of breast cancer? 3) Could a causal relationship between the use of deodorants/antiperspirants and breast cancer be accepted? The scientific data were searched systematically in the PubMed database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez) using standardised search equations. Fifty-nine studies resulting from the literature search were reviewed and nineteen articles with various methodologies were selected for in-depth analysis. In view of the fact that parabens are generally not present in deodorants/antiperspirants, the reflection group's search related purely to the question of aluminium salts. Among these nineteen articles, many are methodologically unsound, do not answer to the questions posed or deal with the question of parabens and were therefore discarded by the reflection group. The expert group's conclusion coincides with those of the French, European and American health authorities. After analysis of the available literature on the subject, no scientific evidence to support the hypothesis was identified and no validated hypothesis appears likely to open the way to interesting avenues of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18829420     DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Cancer        ISSN: 0007-4551            Impact factor:   1.276


  6 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of potential health risks posed by pharmaceutical, occupational and consumer exposures to metallic and nanoscale aluminum, aluminum oxides, aluminum hydroxide and its soluble salts.

Authors:  Calvin C Willhite; Nataliya A Karyakina; Robert A Yokel; Nagarajkumar Yenugadhati; Thomas M Wisniewski; Ian M F Arnold; Franco Momoli; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  The Health Effects of Aluminum Exposure.

Authors:  Katrin Klotz; Wobbeke Weistenhöfer; Frauke Neff; Andrea Hartwig; Christoph van Thriel; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Use of Underarm Cosmetic Products in Relation to Risk of Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Caroline Linhart; Heribert Talasz; Evi M Morandi; Christopher Exley; Herbert H Lindner; Susanne Taucher; Daniel Egle; Michael Hubalek; Nicole Concin; Hanno Ulmer
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 8.143

4.  Non-randomness of the anatomical distribution of tumors.

Authors:  Clare Yu; James Kameron Mitchell
Journal:  Cancer Converg       Date:  2017-12-19

5.  Evaluation of Deodorizing Effects of Saccharina japonica in 10-Month-Old ICR Mice Using a Novel Odor Marker Associated with Aging.

Authors:  Ji Eun Kim; Yun Ju Choi; Su Jin Lee; Jeong Eun Gong; Ji Eun Seong; So Hae Park; Dae Youn Hwang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Aluminum concentrations in central and peripheral areas of malignant breast lesions do not differ from those in normal breast tissues.

Authors:  Raquel Mary Rodrigues-Peres; Solange Cadore; Stefanny Febraio; Juliana Karina Heinrich; Katia Piton Serra; Sophie F M Derchain; Jose Vassallo; Luis Otavio Sarian
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.