Literature DB >> 18829069

Effects of the contraceptive patch, the vaginal ring and an oral contraceptive on APC resistance and SHBG: a cross-over study.

K Fleischer1, H A van Vliet, F R Rosendaal, J Rosing, S Tchaikovski, F M Helmerhorst.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The transdermal patch (20 microg ethinylestradiol+150 microg norelgestromin daily) and the vaginal ring (15 microg ethinylestradiol+120 microg etonogestrel daily) are new contraceptives, designed to deliver a low dose of hormones, suggesting a low exposure. However, few data are available about their risk of venous thrombosis. The objective was to investigate the effect of the patch, the ring, and an oral contraceptive (30 microg ethinylestradiol+150 microg levonorgestrel daily) on activated protein C sensitivity ratio (APC-sr) and on sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels in plasma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a two month wash-out, 13 volunteers were randomly assigned to either the patch followed by the oral contraceptive or vice versa, or the ring followed by the oral contraceptive or vice versa. All treatments lasted two cycles and were separated by a wash-out of two cycles. APC-sr and SHBG levels were determined on day 18-21 of the second cycle of the wash-out and of each treatment period.
RESULTS: Compared to the oral contraceptive, both the patch and the ring led to higher APC resistance (mean difference APC-sr 1.1; 95% CI 0.67-1.52 and 0.55; 95% CI 0.11-1.00, respectively) and higher SHBG levels (mean difference 210 nmol/l; 95% CI 134-286 and 148 nmol/l; 95% CI 48-248, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The activity of the protein C system in plasma was impaired more by contraceptive patch and vaginal ring than by an oral contraceptive containing the second generation progestagen levonorgestrel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18829069     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  7 in total

1.  [Is non-oral hormonal contraception really free of risks? Comment on the case report by Spinner et al].

Authors:  C Thomssen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Estrogen and thrombosis: controversies and common sense.

Authors:  Thomas G DeLoughery
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Ischemic stroke and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Hannah J Roeder; Jean Rodriguez Lopez; Eliza C Miller
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2020

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and serum concentrations of progestins used in contraception.

Authors:  Alexis J Bick; Renate Louw-du Toit; Salndave B Skosana; Donita Africander; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 13.400

5.  Metabolic effects of the contraceptive skin patch and subdermal contraceptive implant in Mexican women: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jesus Hernandez-Juarez; Ethel A Garcia-Latorre; Manuel Moreno-Hernandez; Jose Fernando Moran-Perez; Miguel Angel Rodriguez-Escobedo; Gerardo Cogque-Hernandez; Rubén Julián-Nacer; Xochitl Hernandez-Giron; Rosalia Palafox-Gomez; Irma Isordia-Salas; Abraham Majluf-Cruz
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Hormonal therapies and venous thrombosis: Considerations for prevention and management.

Authors:  Corinne LaVasseur; Suvi Neukam; Thomas Kartika; Bethany Samuelson Bannow; Joseph Shatzel; Thomas G DeLoughery
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-08-23

7.  Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10.

Authors:  Ojvind Lidegaard; Lars Hougaard Nielsen; Charlotte Wessel Skovlund; Ellen Løkkegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.