OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography performed with air and saline (Hydro-HyCoSy) with HyCoSy performed with contrast media (SonoVue) and contrast-tuned imaging technology (CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy) considering hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy (LPS) as reference tests and to evaluate the learning curve of this procedure. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Reproductive unit of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Forty-two infertile female patients. INTERVENTION(S): HyCoSy were performed with a 2.4-mm intrauterine catheter. Patients underwent HSG or LPS as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean age, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, kappa value, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated for statistical analysis. RESULT(S): Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Hydro-HyCoSy were 91%, 71%, 55%, and 95%, respectively, while for CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy they were 87%, 84%, 69%, and 94%. The diagnostic accuracy of Hydro-HyCoSy and of CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy were 77% and 85%, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.52 and 0.66, respectively. CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy does not require a learning curve period. CONCLUSION(S): CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy is more accurate than Hydro-HyCoSy for the assessment of fallopian tubes. The very high normal predictive value of Hydro-HyCoSy suggests that this procedure could be performed as a screening examination, whereas CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy could be used as a second-step technique.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography performed with air and saline (Hydro-HyCoSy) with HyCoSy performed with contrast media (SonoVue) and contrast-tuned imaging technology (CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy) considering hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy (LPS) as reference tests and to evaluate the learning curve of this procedure. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Reproductive unit of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Forty-two infertile female patients. INTERVENTION(S): HyCoSy were performed with a 2.4-mm intrauterine catheter. Patients underwent HSG or LPS as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mean age, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, kappa value, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated for statistical analysis. RESULT(S): Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Hydro-HyCoSy were 91%, 71%, 55%, and 95%, respectively, while for CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy they were 87%, 84%, 69%, and 94%. The diagnostic accuracy of Hydro-HyCoSy and of CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy were 77% and 85%, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.52 and 0.66, respectively. CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy does not require a learning curve period. CONCLUSION(S): CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy is more accurate than Hydro-HyCoSy for the assessment of fallopian tubes. The very high normal predictive value of Hydro-HyCoSy suggests that this procedure could be performed as a screening examination, whereas CnTI-SonoVue-HyCoSy could be used as a second-step technique.
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Michalakis Averkiou; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Richard G Barr; Peter N Burns; Fabrizio Calliada; Vito Cantisani; Byung Choi; Maria C Chammas; Dirk-André Clevert; Michel Claudon; Jean-Michel Correas; Xin-Wu Cui; David Cosgrove; Mirko D'Onofrio; Yi Dong; JohnR Eisenbrey; Teresa Fontanilla; Odd Helge Gilja; Andre Ignee; Christian Jenssen; Yuko Kono; Masatoshi Kudo; Nathalie Lassau; Andrej Lyshchik; Maria Franca Meloni; Fuminori Moriyasu; Christian Nolsøe; Fabio Piscaglia; Maija Radzina; Adrian Saftoiu; Paul S Sidhu; Ioan Sporea; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Claude B Sirlin; Maria Stanczak; Hans-Peter Weskott; Stephanie R Wilson; Juergen Karl Willmann; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Jung Jang; Alexandar Vezeridis; Sue Westerway Journal: Ultrasound Int Open Date: 2018-02-07
Authors: Nienke van Welie; Joukje van Rijswijk; Kim Dreyer; Machiel H A van Hooff; Jan Peter de Bruin; Harold R Verhoeve; Femke Mol; Wilhelmina M van Baal; Maaike A F Traas; Arno M van Peperstraten; Arentje P Manger; Judith Gianotten; Cornelia H de Koning; Aafke M H Koning; Neriman Bayram; David P van der Ham; Francisca P J M Vrouenraets; Michaela Kalafusova; Bob I G van de Laar; Jeroen Kaijser; Arjon F Lambeek; Wouter J Meijer; Frank J M Broekmans; Olivier Valkenburg; Lucy F van der Voet; Jeroen van Disseldorp; Marieke J Lambers; Rachel Tros; Cornelis B Lambalk; Jaap Stoker; Madelon van Wely; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Ben Willem J Mol; Velja Mijatovic Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 6.353