| Literature DB >> 18828896 |
Tanvi Agrawal1, Vikas Vats, Paul K Wallace, Sudha Salhan, Aruna Mittal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the female genital tract can lead to serious sequelae resulting in fertility related disorders. Little is known about the mechanism leading to Chlamydia induced pathology and factors responsible for it. As only some of the women develops reproductive disorders while majority of the women clears infection without any severe sequalae, mucosal immune response in women with or without fertility disorders was studied to identify factors which may lead to final clinical outcome of chlamydial infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18828896 PMCID: PMC2565664 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-6-46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Figure 1Quantification of dendritic cell subsets in cervical mucosa by flow cytometric analysis. (A) Introduction of an acquisition gate (R1) on the forward-scatter (FSC) versus side-scatter (SSC) profile to select mononuclear cell population. (B) cervical DCs were identified within gate R2 as lineage fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) cocktail (contains anti-CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, and CD56) negative and HLA-DR positive. (C-D) Detection of HLA-DR+ CD11c+ myeloid DCs and HLA-DR+CD123+ plasmacytoid DCs respectively. FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter; PerCP, peridin chlorophyll protein; PE, phycoerythrin; APC, allophycocyanin.
Absolute median numbers of LIN-DR+ CD11c+ (mDCs) and LIN-DR+CD123+ (pDCs) dendritic cells in cervix (per cervical sample) and peripheral blood (per milliliter) of Chlamydia trachomatis positive and negative women.
| 6300 (276–24734)¶ | 8138 (175–17525) | 15834 (3148–57180) | ||
| 1254 (0–9634)¶ | 1856 (21–8473)¶ | 28 (0–437) | ||
| 6728 (4637–23820)¶ | 2645 (969–8657) | 12857 (3051–45496) | ||
| 1849 (0–50378)¶ | 3483 (54–10845)¶# | 17 (0–195) |
Note: CT-Chlamydia trachomatis; ¶P < 0.05 compared to controls; #P < 0.05 compared to mDCs in cervix of Chlamydia positive women
The percentage expression of various co-stimulatory molecules on the surface of mDCs and pDCs subsets in cervical mucosa.
| 16.0 ± 3.0a | 12.0 ± 2.2 | 7.0 ± 0.06 | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 32.5 ± 2.5b | 6.0 ± 0.5 | |
| 23.0 ± 0.6a | 28.0 ± 1.8a | 11.0 ± 2.0 | 18.0 ± 2.0a | 38.0 ± 2.4b | 8.0 ± 0.7 | |
| 62.0 ± 7.0 | 59.0 ± 2.6 | 82.0 ± 5.0 | 21.0 ± 4.0 | 20.0 ± 1.9 | 31.0 ± 2.0 | |
| 43.0 ± 3.0a | 37.0 ± 3.8a | 18.0 ± 3.0 | 45.0 ± 3.0 | 41.0 ± 2.7 | 28.0 ± 1.0 | |
Note: CT-Chlamydia trachomatis; FD-Fertility Disorders. The data are means ± SD. To study expression of various costimulatory molecules on mDC and pDC subsets, the gate was set on LIN-DR+ cells, and LIN-DR+ cells are again evaluated on quadrants having one axis as FL-2 (having Abs for costimulatory markers); aP < 0.01 compared to controls; bP < 0.01 compared to controls and CT positive fertile women.
Cytokine concentrations in cervical washes of Chlamydia positive women and controls.
| 34.97 (04.5–418.0) | 19.83 (36.4–598.3) | 74.47 (23.7–1674.8)# | |
| 89.9 (UDL-247.57) | 137.4 (13.7–375.9) | 551.58 (32–1074.0)# | |
| 07.57 (UDL-20.5) | 09.27 (UDL-36.0) | 27.94 (UDL-105.98)# | |
| 127.16 (105.7–279.8) | 294.62 (136.0–275.2)# | 148.51 (89.5–602.9) | |
| 115.91 (95.1–489.5) | 164.37 (103.4-573.7) | 347.96 (144.1–460.3)# | |
| 102.15 (34.8–356.1) | 102.93 (59.8–418.4) | 101.97 (93.2–507.0) |
NOTE. Data represent median values. Figures in parentheses depict range. CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; Dis, Disorders; UDL-Under detection limit
# P < 0.05 compared to other groups by Mann Whitney U test
Levels of β-estradiol, CRP and Progesterone in serum of controls and Chlamydia positive women.
| 205 (142–257) | 1.06 (UD-2.05) | 3.6 (0.2–4.8) | |
| 153 (73–154) | 1.13 (UD-2.27) | 4.1 (0.1–6.1) | |
| 207 (156–243)# | 3.95 (0.57–11.84)# | 3.8 (0.1–5.7) |
NOTE. Data are median levels of β-estradiol and CRP in picograms per milliliter and nanogram per milliliter respectively. Figure in parentheses denote range.
#P < 0.05 compared to other groups