Michael P Bogenschutz1, J Scott Tonigan, Helen M Pettinati. 1. University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Department of Psychiatry and University of New Mexico Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, Albuquerque, New Mexico. mbogenschutz@salud.unm.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether subgroups of alcohol-dependent patients responded differently to naltrexone versus placebo in the NIAAA COMBINE study. In particular, the A versus B and the Early Onset versus Late Onset typologies were examined. Relative to Type A alcoholics, Type B alcoholics are characterized by greater severity, earlier onset, stronger family history, more childhood risk factors (e.g., conduct disorder), and greater frequency of comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders. METHODS: COMBINE study participants were categorized as Type A or Type B using k-means cluster analysis and variables from 5 domains that have been shown to replicate the original Babor typology efficiently. Early Onset was defined as alcohol dependence beginning before age 25. For the planned analyses, the sample was reduced to the 618 participants receivingnaltrexone alone or placebo, either with medical management (MM) alone or with MM plus the Combined Behavioral Intervention (CBI). The a priori primary outcome was percent heavy drinking days during treatment in the groups receiving MM without CBI. RESULTS: Among those receiving MM without CBI, Type A alcoholics had better drinking outcomes with naltrexone than placebo, whereas medication condition did not influence outcomes significantly in the Type Bs. Age of onset was not significantly related to outcome. For those receiving CBI, no significant effects were found for either typology. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, the beneficial effects of opioid antagonism were limited to Type A alcoholics receiving treatment in a MM model. Future studies should investigate the relationship between clinically relevant genotypes, phenotypes such as typologies, and treatment response. More work is also needed to develop practical algorithms for phenotypic assignment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether subgroups of alcohol-dependent patients responded differently to naltrexone versus placebo in the NIAAA COMBINE study. In particular, the A versus B and the Early Onset versus Late Onset typologies were examined. Relative to Type A alcoholics, Type B alcoholics are characterized by greater severity, earlier onset, stronger family history, more childhood risk factors (e.g., conduct disorder), and greater frequency of comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders. METHODS: COMBINE study participants were categorized as Type A or Type B using k-means cluster analysis and variables from 5 domains that have been shown to replicate the original Babor typology efficiently. Early Onset was defined as alcohol dependence beginning before age 25. For the planned analyses, the sample was reduced to the 618 participants receiving naltrexone alone or placebo, either with medical management (MM) alone or with MM plus the Combined Behavioral Intervention (CBI). The a priori primary outcome was percent heavy drinking days during treatment in the groups receiving MM without CBI. RESULTS: Among those receiving MM without CBI, Type A alcoholics had better drinking outcomes with naltrexone than placebo, whereas medication condition did not influence outcomes significantly in the Type Bs. Age of onset was not significantly related to outcome. For those receiving CBI, no significant effects were found for either typology. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, the beneficial effects of opioid antagonism were limited to Type A alcoholics receiving treatment in a MM model. Future studies should investigate the relationship between clinically relevant genotypes, phenotypes such as typologies, and treatment response. More work is also needed to develop practical algorithms for phenotypic assignment.
Authors: O M Lesch; A Riegler; K Gutierrez; I Hertling; K Ramskogler; B Semler; A Zoghlami; N Benda; H Walter Journal: J Biomed Sci Date: 2001 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 8.410
Authors: David W Oslin; Wade Berrettini; Henry R Kranzler; Helen Pettinati; Joel Gelernter; Joseph R Volpicelli; Charles P O'Brien Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2003-06-18 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Lorenzo Leggio; George A Kenna; Miriam Fenton; Erica Bonenfant; Robert M Swift Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2009-01-31 Impact factor: 7.444
Authors: Kelly S DeMartini; Eric G Devine; Carlo C DiClemente; Daniel J Martin; Lara A Ray; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Ralitza Gueorguieva; Ran Wu; Wan-Min Tsai; Patrick G O'Connor; Lisa Fucito; Heping Zhang; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Claire E Wilcox; J Scott Tonigan; Michael P Bogenschutz; Joshua Clifford; Rose Bigelow; Tracy Simpson Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2018 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Lisa M Fucito; Aesoon Park; Suzy Bird Gulliver; Margaret E Mattson; Ralitza V Gueorguieva; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Claire E Wilcox; Charlene J Dekonenko; Andrew R Mayer; Michael P Bogenschutz; Jessica A Turner Journal: Rev Neurosci Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.353
Authors: Rachel A Hay; Joshua H Jennings; Dawnya L Zitzman; Clyde W Hodge; Donita L Robinson Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Claire E Wilcox; Christopher C Abbott; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 5.067