Literature DB >> 18828278

Interpretation reduces ecological impacts of visitors to world heritage site.

Carolyn Littlefair1, Ralf Buckley.   

Abstract

Minimal-impact interpretation is widely used to reduce the ecological impacts of visitors to protected areas. We tested whether verbal appeals and/or role-model demonstrations of minimal-impact behavior by a trained guide reduced noise, litter, and trampling impacts on hiking trails in a subtropical rainforest. Interpretation did reduce impacts significantly. Different interpretive techniques were more effective for different impacts. The experimental groups were mature, well-educated professionals; interpretation may differ in effectiveness for different visitors. Interpretation by skilled guides can indeed reduce visitor impacts in protected areas, especially if role modeling is combined with verbal appeals.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18828278     DOI: 10.1579/07-r-393.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  4 in total

1.  What's the problem? River management, education, and public beliefs.

Authors:  Michael Hughes; Betty Weiler; Jim Curtis
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 2.  Ten factors that affect the severity of environmental impacts of visitors in protected areas.

Authors:  Catherine Marina Pickering
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Effects of Recreational Camping on the Environmental Values of National Parks in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Shashini Tara Mallikage; Priyan Perera; David Newsome; Rangika Bandara; Greg Simpson
Journal:  Trop Life Sci Res       Date:  2021-09-30

4.  Parks and tourism.

Authors:  Ralf Buckley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 8.029

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.