Literature DB >> 18828179

Evaluation of metabolism using stoichiometry in fermentative biohydrogen.

Hyung-Sool Lee1, Bruce E Rittmann.   

Abstract

We first constructed full stoichiometry, including cell synthesis, for glucose mixed-acid fermentation at different initial substrate concentrations (0.8-6 g-glucose/L) and pH conditions (final pH 4.0-8.6), based on experimentally determined electron-equivalent balances. The fermentative bioH2 reactions had good electron closure (-9.8 to +12.7% for variations in glucose concentration and -3 to +2% for variations in pH), and C, H, and O errors were below 1%. From the stoichiometry, we computed the ATP yield based on known fermentation pathways. Glucose-variation tests (final pH 4.2-5.1) gave a consistent fermentation pattern of acetate + butyrate + large H2, while pH significantly shifted the catabolic pattern: acetate + butyrate + large H2 at final pH 4.0, acetate + ethanol + modest H2 at final pH 6.8, and acetate + lactate + trivial H2 at final pH 8.6. When lactate or propionate was a dominant soluble end product, the H2 yield was very low, which is in agreement with the theory that reduced ferredoxin (Fd(red)) formation is required for proton reduction to H2. Also consistent with this hypothesis is that high H2 production correlated with a high ratio of butyrate to acetate. Biomass was not a dominant sink for electron equivalents in H2 formation, but became significant (12%) for the lowest glucose concentration (i.e., the most oligotrophic condition). The fermenting bacteria conserved energy similarly at approximately 3 mol ATP/mol glucose (except 0.8 g-glucose/L, which had approximately 3.5 mol ATP/mol glucose) over a wide range of H2 production. The observed biomass yield did not correlate with ATP conservation; low observed biomass yields probably were caused by accelerated rates of decay or production of soluble microbial products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18828179     DOI: 10.1002/bit.22107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

1.  Hydrogen Production by Immobilized Cells of Clostridium intestinale Strain URNW Using Alginate Beads.

Authors:  Mine Güngörmüşler; Ali Tamayol; David B Levin
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.926

2.  Stoichiometry evaluation of biohydrogen production from various carbohydrates.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Amin; Bijan Bina; Ensiyeh Taheri; Ali Fatehizadeh; Mohammad Ghasemian
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biohydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate: effects of pH, S/X, Fe2+, and magnetite nanoparticles.

Authors:  Karen Reddy; Mahmoud Nasr; Sheena Kumari; Santhosh Kumar; Sanjay Kumar Gupta; Abimbola Motunrayo Enitan; Faizal Bux
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Assessment of metabolic flux distribution in the thermophilic hydrogen producer Caloramator celer as affected by external pH and hydrogen partial pressure.

Authors:  Alessandro Ciranna; Sudhanshu S Pawar; Ville Santala; Matti Karp; Ed W J van Niel
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Influence of acidic pH on hydrogen and acetate production by an electrosynthetic microbiome.

Authors:  Edward V LaBelle; Christopher W Marshall; Jack A Gilbert; Harold D May
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of Acetate-butyrate and Acetate-ethanol Metabolic Pathway in Biohydrogen Production.

Authors:  Ensiyeh Taheri; Mohammad Mehdi Amin; Hamidreza Pourzamani; Ali Fatehizadeh; Mohammad Ghasemian; Bijan Bina
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

7.  Metabolic pairing of aerobic and anaerobic production in a one-pot batch cultivation.

Authors:  Milla Salmela; Tapio Lehtinen; Elena Efimova; Suvi Santala; Rahul Mangayil
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Biohydrogen production under hyper salinity stress by an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor with mixed culture.

Authors:  Ensiyeh Taheri; Mohammad Mehdi Amin; Ali Fatehizadeh; Hamidreza Pourzamani; Bijan Bina; Henri Spanjers
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2018-11-01

9.  Standardized protocol for determination of biohydrogen potential.

Authors:  Julián Carrillo-Reyes; Germán Buitrón; Iván Moreno-Andrade; Aida Cecilia Tapia-Rodríguez; Rodolfo Palomo-Briones; Elías Razo-Flores; Oscar Aguilar-Juárez; Jorge Arreola-Vargas; Nicolas Bernet; Adriana Ferreira Maluf Braga; Lucia Braga; Elena Castelló; Lucile Chatellard; Claudia Etchebehere; Laura Fuentes; Elizabeth León-Becerril; Hugo Oscar Méndez-Acosta; Gonzalo Ruiz-Filippi; Estela Tapia-Venegas; Eric Trably; Jorge Wenzel; Marcelo Zaiat
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2019-12-04

10.  The effect of anode potential on current production from complex substrates in bioelectrochemical systems: a case study with glucose.

Authors:  Fei Zhao; Elizabeth S Heidrich; Thomas P Curtis; Jan Dolfing
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.813

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.