Literature DB >> 18828048

Differentiating non-asbestiform amphibole and amphibole asbestos by size characteristics.

Martin Harper1, Eun Gyung Lee, Stacy S Doorn, Okisha Hammond.   

Abstract

Mining or processing asbestos minerals can liberate isolated fibers or fiber bundles regulated as airborne asbestos fibers. Coarsely crystalline amphibole minerals are more common than asbestos in many geologic environments, and disturbance can result in the release of prismatic or acicular single crystals or cleavage fragments resembling asbestos fibers or fiber bundles but that are not currently regulated as asbestos. Bulk samples of six coarsely crystalline amphiboles and their five asbestos analogs were processed to maximize the number of particles meeting the criterion for counting under the current U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Method 7400 "A" counting rules (> 5 microm long with an aspect ratio >or= 3:1) and also within the respirable width range, i.e. < 3 microm width. The length distributions of the particles produced showed substantial overlap between cleavage fragments and asbestos fibers. Available data sets generally confirmed the relevance of the size distributions of particles generated from reference materials to airborne particles. The length criterion in the current ASTM International standard D7200-06 causes a large proportion (e.g., 40% grunerite and 39% tremolite) of the non-asbestiform particles to be considered potential asbestos. An alternative procedure may be to use a distinction based on width alone as some, but not the majority of, cleavage fragments were thinner than 1 microm (e.g., 9% of actinolite and 20% of grunerite particles), and not many amphibole asbestos particles were wider (e.g., 5% of crocidolite and 18% of amosite particles). This proposal would need further testing. This research should not be considered as addressing any controversy with regard to the toxicity of non-asbestiform amphibole particles of similar dimensions to asbestos particles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18828048     DOI: 10.1080/15459620802462290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  5 in total

1.  Electron microscopy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of epithelial malignant mesothelioma: a case study.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Oczypok; Tim D Oury
Journal:  Ultrastruct Pathol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.094

2.  Characterization of Lone Pine, California, tremolite asbestos and preparation of research material.

Authors:  Martin Harper; Bradley Van Gosen; Owen S Crankshaw; Stacy S Doorn; Todd J Ennis; Sara E Harrison
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-09-29

Review 3.  Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  B W Case; J L Abraham; G Meeker; F D Pooley; K E Pinkerton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Carving of non-asbestiform tremolite and the risk of lung cancer: a follow-up mortality study in a historical nephrite processing cohort.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yu Yang; Ruei-Hao Shie; Pau-Chung Chen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Integration of Evidence on Community Cancer Risks from Elongate Mineral Particles in Silver Bay, Minnesota.

Authors:  Linda D Dell; Alexa E Gallagher; Lisa J Yost; Kenneth A Mundt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.