Literature DB >> 18827488

Changes in outcome during implementation of a fast-track colonic surgery project in a university-affiliated general teaching hospital: advantages reached with ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery project) over a 1-year period.

K J C Jottard1, C van Berlo, L Jeuken, C Dejong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes can be accomplished rapidly after implementing a fast-track colonic surgery project at a university-affiliated general teaching hospital.
METHODS: In 2004 and 2005 all colonic surgery patients were recorded for a number of pre-, per- and postoperative care elements. In 2006, during the implementation of a fast-track program, changes were recorded.
RESULTS: Before the implementation of the fast-track regime at our hospital, 97% of the patients (n = 89/92) received mechanical bowel preparation, in contrast to 3% (n = 1/36) afterwards (p < 0.0001). The application of thoracic epidural analgesia rose from 46% (n = 42/92) in 2004 and 2005 to 94% (n = 34/36) in 2006 (p < 0.0001). The use of nasogastric tubes postoperatively almost disappeared. 77% (n = 28/36) enjoyed a small meal on the 1st day after operation, compared to 0% (n = 0/92) in 2004 and 2005 (p < 0.0001). Median hospital stay was 6 (range 3-27) nights in 2006 compared to 9 (range 3-25) nights in 2005 and 9.5 (range 7-64) nights in 2004 (p < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that also at a district general teaching hospital advantages can be reached rapidly and safely by implementing fast-track surgery; especially a faster recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18827488     DOI: 10.1159/000158910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  5 in total

1.  "Fast track surgery" in the north-west of Italy: influence on the orientation of surgical practice.

Authors:  G Pozzi; A Falcone; F Sabbatino; M Solej; M Nano
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-04-18

2.  Is the effect because of enhanced recovery rather than the laparoscopic approach?

Authors:  R Bethune
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Enhanced recovery for colorectal surgery: Practical hints, results and future challenges.

Authors:  Gianpiero Gravante; Muhammad Elmussareh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-27

4.  Enhanced recovery for non-colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Gianpiero Gravante; Muhammad Elmussareh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Results of introducing a rapid recovery program for total abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dickson; Peter A Argenta; John A Reichert
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.