Literature DB >> 1882741

Flow-sensitive MR imaging of ventriculoperitoneal shunts: in vitro findings, clinical applications, and pitfalls.

M Castillo1, P A Hudgins, J A Malko, B K Burrow, J C Hoffman.   

Abstract

To determine ventriculoperitoneal shunt patency during routine MR imaging of the head, 23 patients were studied with T1-weighted fast-field-echo scans. Without knowledge of the results of previous MR/CT studies or of the patients' clinical history, we reviewed the fast-field-echo studies and divided them according to those judged to have shunt flow (18) and those judged not to have flow (five). Fast-field-echo sequences showed high signal intensity, consistent with CSF flow and shunt patency in 17 medium-pressure systems and one high-pressure system. No signal was seen in five patients with high-pressure valve shunts. Combined clinical evaluation and MR/CT studies showed that three patients had probable shunt malfunction. One patient had true shunt malfunction; and although malfunction was thought to be present in two symptomatic patients, surgical revision showed the shunts to be patent. The possibility of temporary shunt obstruction is postulated to explain the clinical and MR findings in those two cases. The remaining two cases (9% of the patients) had no clinical evidence of shunt malfunction, and the MR findings probably reflected periodic CSF flow. One patient had an intracranial segment that was not connected and showed no flow on MR. No false-positive results (apparent flow in a nonfunctioning shunt) occurred. Using a standard medium-pressure shunt system, we constructed and imaged a phantom, which confirmed our clinical observations. T1-weighted fast-field-echo sequences may be useful in assessing patency of medium-pressure CSF shunt systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1882741      PMCID: PMC8331583     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  5 in total

1.  The adult radiographic shuntogram.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; S Valliappan; J H Uselman; M P Spearman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Cerebrospinal fluid flow imaging by using phase-contrast MR technique.

Authors:  B Battal; M Kocaoglu; N Bulakbasi; G Husmen; H Tuba Sanal; C Tayfun
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  CSF shunt physics: factors influencing inshunt CSF flow.

Authors:  C Kadowaki; M Hara; M Numoto; K Takeuchi; I Saito
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Overdrainage and shunt technology. A critical comparison of programmable, hydrostatic and variable-resistance valves and flow-reducing devices.

Authors:  A Aschoff; P Kremer; C Benesch; K Fruh; A Klank; S Kunze
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Imaging of cerebrospinal fluid flow: fundamentals, techniques, and clinical applications of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adrian Korbecki; Anna Zimny; Przemysław Podgórski; Marek Sąsiadek; Joanna Bladowska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.