BACKGROUND: Exercise referral schemes are widespread across England. National guidance emphasises the need to engage groups that are disadvantaged. AIM: To examine the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on referral to, and use of, exercise referral schemes. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional analysis of patients referred by general practices to exercise referral schemes between 2004 and 2006. SETTING: Six primary care trusts (PCTs) in Greater London. METHOD: Routine data about patients who had been referred to exercise referral schemes were used to estimate risk ratios for referral by general practice deprivation quintile, odds ratios (ORs) for uptake, and ORs for completion of exercise referral schemes by patients' deprivation status quintile. RESULTS: All 317 general practices in the six PCTs were included in the referral analysis. Referrals were less likely from general practices serving advantaged socioeconomic areas (adjusted risk ratio for trend across deprivation quintiles 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.93). This study found no association between patients' deprivation status and their likelihood of taking up (adjusted OR, least versus most deprived quintile 1.05; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.33) or completing the scheme (adjusted OR 1.23; 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.79). CONCLUSION: General practices within areas of deprivation were more likely to refer patients to exercise referral schemes than practices in more advantaged areas. Once referred, it was found that patients living in areas of deprivation were as likely to take up and to complete the scheme as those living in more advantaged locations. Research is needed to identify the organisational and contextual factors that allow this pattern of service delivery, which appears to facilitate access to care among patients who live in areas of deprivation.
BACKGROUND: Exercise referral schemes are widespread across England. National guidance emphasises the need to engage groups that are disadvantaged. AIM: To examine the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on referral to, and use of, exercise referral schemes. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional analysis of patients referred by general practices to exercise referral schemes between 2004 and 2006. SETTING: Six primary care trusts (PCTs) in Greater London. METHOD: Routine data about patients who had been referred to exercise referral schemes were used to estimate risk ratios for referral by general practice deprivation quintile, odds ratios (ORs) for uptake, and ORs for completion of exercise referral schemes by patients' deprivation status quintile. RESULTS: All 317 general practices in the six PCTs were included in the referral analysis. Referrals were less likely from general practices serving advantaged socioeconomic areas (adjusted risk ratio for trend across deprivation quintiles 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76 to 0.93). This study found no association between patients' deprivation status and their likelihood of taking up (adjusted OR, least versus most deprived quintile 1.05; 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.33) or completing the scheme (adjusted OR 1.23; 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.79). CONCLUSION: General practices within areas of deprivation were more likely to refer patients to exercise referral schemes than practices in more advantaged areas. Once referred, it was found that patients living in areas of deprivation were as likely to take up and to complete the scheme as those living in more advantaged locations. Research is needed to identify the organisational and contextual factors that allow this pattern of service delivery, which appears to facilitate access to care among patients who live in areas of deprivation.
Authors: David V B James; Lynne H Johnston; Diane Crone; Adrienne H Sidford; Chris Gidlow; Clare Morris; Charlie Foster Journal: J Sports Sci Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 3.337
Authors: Christopher Gidlow; Lynne H Johnston; Diane Crone; Clare Morris; Alex Smith; Charlie Foster; David V B James Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2007-03-06 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Johanna M Huijg; Winifred A Gebhardt; Marieke W Verheijden; Nicolette van der Zouwe; Juriena D de Vries; Barend J C Middelkoop; Mathilde R Crone Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2015-02
Authors: Coral L Hanson; Lis Neubeck; Richard G Kyle; Norrie Brown; Robyn Gallagher; Robyn A Clark; Sheona McHale; Susan Dawkes Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Caryl M Beynon; Amy Luxton; Rhiannon Whitaker; N Tim Cable; Lucy Frith; Adrian H Taylor; Lu Zou; Peter Angell; Scott Robinson; Dave Holland; Sharon Holland; Mark Gabbay Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Caroline J Dodd-Reynolds; Dimitris Vallis; Adetayo Kasim; Nasima Akhter; Coral L Hanson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.390